The Origin Problem

Can Information Exist Without Choice or Chance?

According to Joey Lawsin: Information can only be acquired in two ways: by choice or by chance. This means that a closed system, a universe where all knowledge must have a traceable origin, is created.

But past‑life memories, especially in children, introduce a paradox:

How can someone recall information they never encountered?

So let me break this down:

1. The Closed-System Problem

Lawsin’s Information Acquisition Theory asserts that:

• Information cannot appear spontaneously
• Information cannot be inherited but acquired
• Information cannot be transferred across lifetimes
• Information cannot exist without a source

This is a closed epistemic system, everything must come from inside the loop of experience.

However, if a child can describe events from a time they never lived through, especially something as specific as World War II, it feels like it points to something deeper. Across cultures, people have interpreted these experiences in different ways, including past‑life memories or reincarnation. This narratives challenges this system. This suggests:

• information entered the mind without choice
• information entered the mind without chance
• information entered the mind without exposure

This is the philosophical equivalent of a glitch in the originemology  matrix.

2. The Source Paradox

If a child knows something they never learned, we face a question:

Where did the information come from?

There are only three philosophical possibilities:

A. The information did come from choice or chance

…but the source is hidden, forgotten, or subconscious.

B. The information was constructed internally

The brain invented a memory using fragments of existing knowledge.

C. The information came from a source outside the choice/chance model

This breaks Lawsin’s Originemology theory. This is the philosophical “danger zone,” because it implies:

• consciousness may not be limited to one lifetime
• memory may not be tied to the brain
• information may exist independently of experience

This is where my next research goes next: reincarnation.

3. The Third Path Problem

If information can appear without choice or chance, then:

• Lawsin’s Originemology Caveman in the Box model is incomplete
• the epistemic system is open, not closed
• consciousness may have access to non-local information
• memory may not be purely biological

This introduces a third path: Information acquired through non-physical means. This means:

• consciousness may be continuous
• memory may transcend the body
• identity may not be bound to a single lifetime

This is not a scientific claim; it’s a philosophical implication.

4. The Ontological Shock

If a child truly recalls a past life, it forces a reevaluation of:

• what a “self” is
• what memory is
• what consciousness is
• what information is
• what life is

It challenges the assumption that: The mind begins at birth and ends at death.

This is called ontological shock, when a single experience forces you to question the structure of reality.

5. The Philosophical Fork in the Road

Here we end up with two paths:

Path 1: Preserve Lawsin’s Theory

Explain the memory through:

• hidden exposure
• subconscious absorption
• imagination
• confabulation
• cryptomnesia

Path 2: Challenge Lawsin’s Theory

Accept that some information may:

• originate outside physical experience
• be carried across lifetimes
• exist independently of the brain

This opens the door to:

• reincarnation
• collective consciousness
• non-local memory
• metaphysical continuity

6. The Real Question Behind All This

The real philosophical question isn’t:

“Is reincarnation real?”

It’s: “Can information exist without a physical source?”

If the answer is yes, then:

• consciousness is not confined
• memory is not local
• identity is not singular
• Lawsin’s theory is incomplete

If the answer is no, then:

• all past-life memories must be explainable
• the universe remains closed
• consciousness is brain-bound

This is where the core of the debate comes in.

7. The Episode Angle

“If information can only be acquired by choice or by chance, then a child remembering a past life should be impossible.

But if the memory is real, if the details are accurate, then the information came from somewhere.

And if it didn’t come from choice, and it didn’t come from chance, then where did it come from?”

Based on Lawsin's Caveman in the Box Theory:

1. “Mother Nature as the Database”

Based on Originemology:

“Information can’t exist without Mother Nature. It is a database of information.”

• Nature is the origin of all information
• Nature is the storage system of all information
• Nature is the processor of all information

In this model, nothing exists outside the natural system. Every piece of information — physical, biological, mental — must come from within the universe’s own structure. As we said this is a closed‑universe information model.

It’s similar to ideas in:

• Naturalism
• Pancomputationalism (the universe computes itself)
• Physicalism (everything is physical information)
• Inscriptionism (information is acquired by choice or chance within nature)

In all these frameworks, information cannot appear from nowhere.

2. If Nature Is the Database, Then Memory Must Come From Nature

If a child “remembers” something they never learned, then:

• the information must already exist in nature
• the child must have accessed it somehow
• the memory must have a natural pathway

But, of course, this idea of “past life memory” as something supernatural is not true. Instead, it claims: If the memory is real, it must come from the natural database. The question is: how did the child access it?

3. Three Naturalistic Explanations

If information can only come from Mother Nature, then unusual memories must come from:

A. Environmental absorption (chance). The child picked up the information indirectly.

B. Cognitive construction (internal recombination). The brain built a memory from fragments already in the natural database.

C. Non-local natural information (the controversial one). The child accessed information stored in nature but not through normal sensory experience.

4. The “Non-Local Information” Hypothesis

If nature is a database, then theoretically:

• information exists everywhere
• gnosis (consciousness) might access information beyond personal experience
• memory might not be limited to the brain
• the mind might tap into patterns stored in the natural world

This is not supernatural; it’s natural information theory pushed to its limits. In these frameworks, information is woven into the fabric of reality.

A child accessing WWII memories wouldn’t be reincarnation; it would be information retrieval from the natural database.

5. The Philosophical Tension

If Information cannot exist outside nature

Therefore, all memories must come from nature

Therefore, even impossible memories must have a natural source

Therefore, either:

• the child absorbed the information indirectly
• the brain constructed it
• or consciousness accessed information stored in nature in a non‑ordinary way

This is a closed‑system explanation that still allows for extraordinary experiences.

6. The Big Question

If Mother Nature is the database of all information, then:

Does awareness have more than one way to access that database?

It doesn’t require reincarnation. 

It doesn’t require the supernatural. 

It doesn’t break natural law.

It simply asks:

Is the human mind limited to sensory input, or can it access deeper layers of natural information?

That’s a question worthy of an entire book.

The Origin of the First Information Problem:

If Information can only be acquired in two ways:

1. By choice → deliberate learning, intentional exposure

2. By chance → accidental, passive, or environmental exposure

and, Mother Nature is the ultimate database of information. Humans cannot acquire information

outside these two pathways.

If so,

1. Where did the first information come from?

2. What was the source before any mind existed?

3. How did nature "choose" or "chance" the first data?

This is the classic Origin Problem, and Lawsin' Inscirptionism has resolved this problem. Inscriptionism is so powerful as long as information has a traceable source. That's why in his book Originemology, Lawsin claims that "everything has a beginning". If information can appear without choice or chance, then originemology has limitation.

Nature is the Information:

1. She doesn't acquire information.

2. She has the information stored in her.

3. She processes information.

Information is not something added to nature. Nature if Information.

This dissolves the origin problem completely. There is no "first information" because information is identical to existence itself.

Nature doesn't need Choice or Chance:

The Lawsin's Maxim: "Information is acquired by choice or by chance" applies only to humans, not to nature. Humans must (1) choose to observe, (2) or accidentally encounter. But Nature doesn't "encounter" anything. She simply is. This means: (1) Humans acquire information, (2) Nature is information. This is the distinction that resolves the origin problem.

This creates a two layer model of reality:

Layer 1: Nature is infinite, self-existing, not-acquired, not learned, not chosen, not accidental, but simply is.

Layer2 : Humans are the constructors of information. They interpret nature, convert patterns into meaning, acquire information through choice or chance, build concepts, languages , and symbols.

Humans don't create information. They translate nature into human constructs.

This explains why information feels "discovered" not invented. When humans learn something new, it often feels like: uncovering, revealing, discovering, noticing. Because the information was already there in nature.

Humans didn't create information. They simply accessed it from Nature.

Nature is the source of all information. Humans only acquire fragments of it through choice or chance. The origin problem is solved because information never began. It always existed as Nature.

"Humans don't create information. They translate nature into human constructs". ~ Joey Lawsin

Fundamentals of Existence

Theory of Inscription by Design

Joey Lawsin’s Fundamentals of Existence, also called the One Theory of Everything, explains existence as something that appears only when certain conditions come together. In his view, existence is not made of permanent things but of temporary phenomena shaped by material and inscription. 

At the center of his ideas is Generated Interim Emergence, which asserts that phenomena such as consciousness, emotions, dreams, colors, and even life itself are not independent creations. They are temporary events that arise only when the right material and inscription are both present. He named this concept as Poised or Latent Existence. 

Poised or latent existence refers to a state of potential being, called Interim, that is not currently visible, active, or fully developed, but which has the capacity to emerge or become manifest when the necessary conditions are met. Just as temperature exists only when molecules move at certain speeds, or pressure exists only when matter interacts in specific ways, thoughts and sensations appear only when the right circumstances align. When those circumstances vanish, the phenomena vanish as well.

Lawsin also speaks of Evokement, the process by which existence unfolds through chains of cause and effect. Nothing exists in isolation; every phenomenon is evoked by something else. A rainbow is evoked by the interaction of light and water droplets, while sound is evoked by vibrations moving through air. Each phenomenon depends on other factors, and when those factors disappear, the phenomenon ceases to exist. 

To explain why these temporary realities appear at all, Lawsin connects his ideas to Inscriptionism, his broader philosophy that sees everything in reality as a kind of inscription or encoded design. Just as writing carries meaning through patterns, existence itself is produced by inscriptions interacting with physical conditions. He also coined the term Originemology to describe the study of origins, which asks how phenomena arise and why they appear only under certain conditions.

To make these ideas clearer, Lawsin points to everyday examples. Temperature exists only when molecules move at certain speeds, and without motion, temperature does not exist. Consciousness emerges only when physical structures such as brains or machines reach specific conditions, and without those conditions, consciousness is absent. Music and color are not tangible things but emergent properties that arise from vibrations or wavelengths interacting with perception. Gravity is experienced only when mass interacts with space-time, and without mass, the sensation of gravity does not exist. Sound arises only when vibrations travel through a medium such as air or water, and without a medium, sound is absent. Smell appears only when chemical particles stimulate sensory receptors, electricity manifests only when electrons flow through a conductor, rainbows occur only when light refracts through water droplets, and shadows exist only when an object blocks light. Each of these examples shows how phenomena are temporary and dependent on conditions.

Lawsin’s Fundamentals of Existence matter because they bring together many different ideas about life, science, and philosophy into one explanation. Instead of treating physics, consciousness, and metaphysics as separate subjects, his theory shows how they are connected. He explains that existence itself is not permanent but something that appears only when the right conditions are present. This makes his work important because it gives people a way to see how everything fits together. His ideas also challenge the traditional view of materialism, which often says that reality is just matter and that everything, including thoughts and feelings, can be reduced to physical parts. Lawsin disagrees by saying that reality is not fixed matter but something that constantly emerges and disappears. He encourages us to see the world as active and changing, not as something solid and unchanging.

The implications of his theory extend into technology, especially artificial intelligence. Lawsin talks about “autognorics,” which is the idea of creating machines that can generate consciousness. If consciousness is not a permanent thing but something that appears when certain conditions are met, then machines could, in theory, be built to create those same conditions. This opens up new possibilities for how we think about intelligent machines and whether they could one day be truly aware. Beyond science and technology, Lawsin’s view also affects how we think about everyday life. If everything we experience is temporary and dependent on conditions, then things we often take for granted—like emotions, colors, or even identity—are not permanent truths. They are passing realities that exist only when the right circumstances come together. This way of thinking can change how we see ourselves and the world, making us more aware of how fragile and conditional existence really is.

In short, Lawsin’s Fundamentals of Existence claim that reality is not made of permanent things but of temporary phenomena that arise only when conditions allow. This idea connects different areas of thought, challenges old beliefs, and opens new doors for science, technology, and philosophy. By showing that existence is dynamic and dependent, Lawsin gives us a fresh way to understand both the universe and our place in it. When we notice a rainbow fading, a shadow disappearing, or a song coming to an end, we are reminded of his point: existence is never permanent. It is always something that flickers into being when the right conditions meet and then fades away once those conditions change.

IN summary:

• Existence is temporary and conditional, appearing only when the right circumstances align.
• Generated Interim Emergence (GIE): phenomena such as consciousness, emotions, dreams, and colors are not permanent but arise when conditions allow.
• Poised Existence: realities like temperature, pressure, or thought exist only while their supporting factors remain.
• Evokement: everything is part of a chain of cause and effect; no phenomenon exists in isolation.
• Inscriptionism: reality can be seen as encoded patterns or inscriptions that generate phenomena when activated.
• Originemology: the study of origins, focusing on how and why phenomena arise under specific conditions.
• Everyday examples—rainbows, shadows, sound, smell, electricity—show how familiar experiences depend on temporary factors.
• The theory challenges materialism, reframing reality as dynamic and emergent rather than fixed matter.
• It has implications for artificial intelligence, suggesting machines could generate consciousness if the right conditions are created.
• Ultimately, Lawsin’s view encourages us to see reality as fragile, interconnected, and ever-changing, reminding us that permanence is an illusion.

"Existence is not permanent. 

It is not singular. 

It is relational. 

It is conditional.

It is interim. 

It is poised. 

It is engineered. 

It is awakened. "

~ Joey Lawsin

Fundamentals of Existence:

for something to exist it must have:

1. material and inscription - inscription by design

2. relational existence - single theory of everything

3. not permanent - generated interim emergence

4. poised - latent existence

5. energy - emergent energy

6. process - evokement

7. creation

The Origin of Origins

What is Orignemology?

Originemology is a concept developed by Joey Lawsin that means the study of origins. It combines linguistic roots to capture the idea of tracing everything back to its first cause:

Originem (Latin) → “origin” or “beginning.”

Onoma (Greek) → “name.”

Logos (Greek) → “study” or “reason.”

Together, Originemology becomes a discipline that looks at beginnings not only in the material sense (matter, particles, physical reality) but also in the instructional sense (patterns, codes, knowledge, meaning). It asks: Where does anything truly begin?

Unlike traditional etymology (which studies the origin of words) or ontology (which studies the nature of being), Originemology is broader. It treats beginnings as puzzles, where both intuitive material and embedded instruction, known as the Theory of Inscription by Design, are essential in the creation process. It is neither purely science nor purely philosophy, but a fusion of both.

So, Originemology is essentially the origin of beginnings — the search for the seed and rule from which all things grow and develop.

The Origin of Language

Every civilization begins with words. Before cities, before machines, before laws, there was language. It is the first tool of thought, the bridge between imagination and reality.  

At its origin, language was not written or spoken in the way we know today. It began as gestures, sounds, and markings—primitive signals that carried meaning. A raised hand could warn of danger. A carved symbol could mark ownership. A rhythmic chant could unite a tribe. These were the seeds of communication.  

Over time, these seeds grew into systems. Sounds became syllables, syllables became words, and words became sentences. Each step added structure, allowing humans not only to share information but to preserve memory, to tell stories, and to pass knowledge across generations.  

Language evolved alongside human needs. In trade, it became numbers. In law, it became codes. In art, it became poetry. In science, it became formulas. Every discipline carries within it the origin of language, reshaped to serve its purpose.  

But the true origin of language lies deeper than utility. It is rooted in identity. To name something is to give it existence. To speak a word is to make it real. In this way, language is not just a tool—it is creation itself.  

Originemology teaches us that by tracing language back to its beginnings, we uncover the moment when thought first became sound, when imagination first became shared, and when humanity first began to build worlds together.

The Origin of Numbers

Every society begins by counting. Before alphabets, before machines, before laws, there was the need to measure and compare. Numbers are among humanity’s oldest inventions, born not from theory but from necessity.  

At their origin, numbers were not symbols on paper. They were marks on bones, scratches on stone, knots in rope, or tallies carved into wood. Each mark represented something tangible: a sheep in the flock, a day that had passed, a measure of grain stored for winter. Numbers began as memory aids, tools to keep track of life’s essentials.  

Over time, these marks evolved into systems. Simple tallies became groupings, groupings became symbols, and symbols became numerals. The leap from counting objects to abstract representation was revolutionary. It allowed humans to think beyond the immediate, to calculate, to plan, and to imagine quantities that did not yet exist.  

Different cultures created their own seeds of number systems. The Babylonians used base‑60, the Mayans base‑20, and the Romans their famous numerals carved into stone. Each system reflected the environment and needs of its people, yet all shared the same origin: the human impulse to measure and order the world.  

Numbers did not remain confined to counting. They grew into mathematics, the language of patterns and relationships. With numbers, humans could chart the stars, measure land, and build monuments. They became the foundation of trade, science, and technology.  

At their core, numbers remind us of the originemological principle: from a simple seed, infinite worlds can grow. A single tally mark on a bone evolved into equations that describe galaxies. What began as a scratch in stone became the digital codes that power modern civilization.  

Numbers are proof that origins matter. They show how the smallest beginnings—marks, tallies, seeds—can expand into universes of meaning.  

The Origin of Identity

Every origin story eventually turns inward. Beyond language and numbers lies something even more fundamental: identity. To know the world, we must first know ourselves.  

At its origin, identity was simple. It began with recognition: the ability to distinguish one thing from another. A hunter recognized his tribe from strangers. A mother recognized her child’s face. A mark on a stone distinguished ownership. These acts of recognition were the seeds of identity.  

Over time, recognition grew into naming. To give something a name was to grant it permanence. Names carried memory, lineage, and belonging. They became symbols of selfhood, binding individuals to families, tribes, and communities. Identity was no longer just recognition; it became meaning.  

Identity evolved alongside culture. In rituals, it became roles. In trade, it became reputation. In law, it became citizenship. In philosophy, it became the question of the self. Each layer added complexity, but each layer traced back to the same origin: the human need to define and distinguish.  

At its core, identity is both personal and collective. It tells us who we are, but also who we are among others. It is the origin of society, the foundation of morality, and the spark of individuality. Without identity, there is no belonging, no responsibility, no story.  

Originemology teaches us that identity is not fixed; it is an evolving origin. It begins with recognition, grows through naming, and expands into meaning. From a simple mark or sound, it becomes the vast architecture of selfhood that shapes civilizations.  

The Origin of Inlearning

Before language, before numbers, before identity, there was inlearning. It is the oldest origin, the quiet process by which life absorbed knowledge without conscious thought. Inlearning was not instinct, but experience carried forward, behaviors inherited from parents and passed down through countless generations.  

At its origin, inlearning was simple. A bird learned to build a nest by watching others. A fish learned to swim upstream by following the current of its kind. A human learned to flee from fire or fight for food by observing the tribe. These were not automatic reflexes, but lessons etched into memory and repeated until they became second nature. Inlearning was the first teacher, shaping life without explanation.  

Over time, inlearning grew into patterns. Hunger became agriculture. Shelter became architecture. Fear became caution, and curiosity became exploration. What began as imitation evolved into knowledge, and knowledge grew into innovation. Inlearning was the seed from which wisdom sprouted.  

Even today, inlearning remains at the core of human experience. It guides decisions, warns in danger, and inspires creativity. It is the origin of intuition, the quiet voice that emerges from generations of accumulated lessons.  

Originemology reveals inlearning as the foundation of progress. It is both ancient and immediate, both inherited and essential. It reminds us that beneath every equation, every invention, every civilization lies a simple truth: we learn from those before us, and in that learning, we create the future.  

The Origin of Everything

According to Joey Lawsin’s Theory on Inscription by Design, existence is not born from matter alone. It arises from the union of matter and instruction. Matter provides the substance, the raw material of reality. Instruction provides the design, the embedded code in matter that guides how matter behaves, interacts, and evolves.  

This union is what Lawsin calls Inscriptionism. Matter, by itself, is inert. Instruction, by itself, is abstract. But when the two are combined, they generate form, function, and meaning. Every particle, every living cell, every system carries within it inscriptions—patterns that dictate how it will act, replicate, or transform.  

In this view, existence are not accidents. They are engineered. The universe is not simply a collection of objects but a network of embedded instructions. These inscriptions are what allow matter to organize into atoms, atoms into molecules, molecules into life, and life into consciousness.  

Lawsin’s framework shows that creation is always dual:  

- Material is the medium.  

- Inscription is the message.  

Together, they form the architecture of existence. Without matter, there is nothing to hold. Without instruction, there is nothing to follow. But united, they become the seed of reality itself.  

Originemology embraces this principle by treating beginnings as puzzles of both substance and script. To study origins is not only to ask what exists, but also what guides existence. Matter is the canvas, instruction the inscription upon it. And in their union lies the true origin of creation.  

The articles and answers to the following questions listed are found in the book Originemology. 

(i) How did languages evolve?

(ii) How did numbers evolve?
(iii) How did information evolve?
(iv) How did equations evolve?
(v) How did measurements evolve?
(vi) How did intelligence evolve?
(vii) How did computers evolve?
(viii) How did religions evolve?
(ix) How did machines evolve?
(x) How did reality evolve?
(xi) How did life evolve?
(xii) How did everything evolve?

      "Nothing exists unless something causes it to exist." ~ Joey Lawsin

About the Author :

Joey Lawsin is the author of the book "Originemology". He is a reformist who wants to change the world by rewriting the textbooks with new concepts that debunk the old scientific, theological, and philosophical ideas of antiquity. He published a book in Physics, created a conscious machine known as Biotronics, and formulated a new school of thought known as "Exyzforms". The concept was discovered from "The Biotronics Project".

Originemology: The Origin of Origins

First drafted 1988 published 2000 revised Sep 2012
by Joey Lawsin

Originemology, the science behind the beginning of everything or the "study of the origin of origins", is a pioneering discipline that investigates generally the roots or origins of everything through the natural emergence of intuitive materials and embedded instructions comprehensively known as Inscription by Design (ID).

This new school of thought was conceptualized mainly to determine the Genesis of Information - the origin, creation, and evolution of early primordial, ancient, and modern information based on the following basic guiding scientific questions:

1. How did information emerge into the early minds of the very first humans?
2. Who or what supplied our primitive ancestors with information?
3. Where did it originate? Where did it come from?
4. Was the source of information a who or a what? Was it god, space aliens, or something else?
5. How does information transform into inscription and instruction?

Originemology's scope is threefold:

1. It examines the origins of human-created ideas or concepts such as languages, numbers, behaviors, emotions, gods, and tools.

2. It investigates the origins of natural objects, including the universe, elements, plants, and animals.

3. It explores the inherent laws of nature to synthesize a unified theory, often referred to as the Single Theory of Everything.

In a broader sense, Originemology is a cross-disciplinary field that integrates comparative research from various subfields, including anthropology, archaeology, geography, history, chronology, etymology, ideology, onomatology, ontology, and epistemology. The primary objective of this collaboration is to systematically trace the primal source or origin of information or ideas—whether abstract or physical—from a single elemental entity to a complex structure, using evidence-based findings. 

Originemology, which is also the study of the origins of ideas, is structured around by five supporting fundamental questions:

1. How did the original idea emerge?
2. Who was the originator of the idea?
3. Where was the idea first conceptualized
4. When was the idea first conceptualized?
5. Why was the idea conceptualized in the first place?

The five cardinal collaborating principles that lay the foundations of Originemology constitute the following signature theories:
(i) The Caveman in the Box Trilogy,
(ii) Codexation Dilemma,
(iii) Intuitive Objects,
(iv) Inscription by Design
(v) Generated Interim Emergence

The new study is also instrumental in shedding new insights into the five major ancient questions:
a. Who or what created the universe?
b. How is all creation formed?
c. Where did we come from?
d. Why are we here?

Originemology is a novel and innovative scientific approach into understanding the nature and origin of life,  intelligence, and consciousness as well. By examining the inherent inscriptions in objects, both aneural and neural, originemology reveals the fundamental orders of being alive, living, and with life. This discipline also challenges the conventional views of cognition and behavior, proposing a new paradigm termed  “A Brain without The Brain” (The Brein Theory), which explains how aneural organisms can exhibit intelligence and consciousness. 

Furthermore, Originemology asserts that everything has a beginning - a source of origin. The beginning simultaneously both exists and doesn't exist. Everything starts from birth. Birth, the first inherent "genetic" code that gave everything its beginning, is the first instruction in the natural algorithm of creation. Conversely, everything ends as well. The end is called death. Death is the last or final instruction, genetic or otherwise, in the natural process of creation.

Originemology also claims that everything is a particle of information and every particle is an instruction. Instructional or information particles are referred to as iParticles. They are called namons or names in human experiences. An iParticle can be a single concept, a collection of ideas, or a piece of information that is acquired, copied, utilized, and passed on from one atom to another atom, from one memory cell to another memory cell, from one substance to another substance, from one species to another species, from one culture to another culture, or from one generation to another generation. iParticle is a cultural hereditary LINK (lawsinic instructional konstant) that connects everything and everyone. It is the fundamental fiber that weaves the tree of life.

The Theory of Originemology, although experimentally extrapolated from the Caveman-in-the-Box Trilogy and the Bowlingual Paradigm, was originally conceptualized and mathematically formulated based on the creation and evolution of the isodimensional morphical figures known as IDMF. Using a computer program and an actual structural model, the conclusive outcome of the IDMF configuration was discovered to be a Helixical Torus Dimetrix. In layman's terms, the final shape was a donut. With one rule and one type of object, the complex creation and evolution of the IDMF were made.

The word Originemology comes from the greek words  "genesis" (origin),  "onoma" (name), and "logos" (study).  Originemology attempts to unify the following related fields to explore the most fundamental questions of existence:

• Cosmology: The study of the origins and development of the universe.
• Ontology: The branch of metaphysics dealing with the nature of being and existence.
• Etymology: The study of the origin of words and how their meanings have changed throughout history.
• Abiogenesis: The study of how life on Earth might have originated from inanimate matter.

Origenomology was originally named Genonology": from "genesis" (origin) and "logos" (study) – the study of origins. However, I added the word "name" (onoma) to emphasize that everything has a name, a label, a tag, an association, a description, a definition, or information in general.

ISBN: 978-1-4357-9408-5

ISBN: 978-1-3879-8897-6

I will highlight a few of the fascinating points of the research covered in the book Originemology:

Part 1. The Experimental Study on AI with Family Dogs
Part 2. The Codexation Dilemma.
Part 3. The Analysis of the Origin of the Number System.

Part 1. The Case on the Acquisition of Information:

Objective: 
How is information generated and acquired by animals, in particular by Canis Familiaris?

Specimen: 
1. A giant malamute (control)
2. A mini chihuahua (experimental)

Methods:
1. A newborn husky is restrained from acquiring information from his environment.
2. The research environment is controlled and restricted from people, animals, and objects.
3. The emergence of information is strictly introduced by associative learning and discovery.
4. The experimental subject is presented to another breed after a couple of years.
5. The transfer of information to the experimental subject is documented.

Data: 
1. Voice recognition through waveform signature generated by an oscilloscope.
2. Transfer of information from the control subjects to the experimental.
3. List of information (eg. words, actions) acquired by association and by discovery.

Conclusion:
1. Information is acquired only in two and only two ways: by choice and by chance.
2. Information is acquired from one's own environment.
3. The mind of a newborn is completely empty of information.
4. Nature is the Mother of Information and Energy is Nature's language.
5. New Principles and Paradigms originally discovered in Originemology and its Signature Theories.

Part 2. The Codexation Dilemma:

- Please see the partial paper here

Part 3. The Creation and Evolution of the Number System:

When I was a kid, I was deeply fascinated with numbers at a very early age I learned to count from 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 by heart. Then, the next 10 numbers ....10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20. And, the next group of ten numbers.....21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 .... and so forth and so on until I learned to recite each number from 1 to 100 with confidence.

However, visualizing and mastering these groups of numbers was far from easy. Well, one thing was for sure, I was not good at memorization. So I figured out a simple way of remembering these numbers. As I was writing all the numbers from 1 to 100 on a piece of paper, in groups of ten, I realized that the first ten numbers .... 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 .... were being used over and over again entirely on the list. This was the AHA moment. The set of ten counting numbers was the secret pattern that created the whole numerical system. It was the "genetic code" of the numeral kingdom so to speak. The "seed' in the life of the base-ten numbers.

Examination:
To show how these numbers generate ad infinitum, let us use the table matrix as shown below. In the top row, the numbers – 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 - are individually listed in each box. These ten basic digits serve as the seed or base. In the first column, meanwhile, the numbers listed downward are simply a guidepost or reference point. The rule of creating the numbers is simple: every number in this column will be paired with each number in the top row.

Replication:
So to produce the next 10 new numbers, the 10 numbers in the top row will be replicated on the second row. Then, from the first column, the number 1 will be paired side by side with the number 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9. Once done, the result in the second row will now look like this: 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19. From the 10 counting numbers that started from 0 to 9, the set is now transformed into 10, 11, 12 ... to 19.

If the same basic set of ten numbers ... 0123456789 ... is paired now with number 2, the next new group of numbers becomes 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29. Thus, after counting from 0 to 19, the numbers 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29 come next.

As the same rule is repeated and the same numbers are used over and over again, the next group in the fourth row becomes ...30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39. In the fifth row, the next group is 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49. In the sixth row, the next group is 50, 1, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, and so forth, and so on.

Propagation:
Therefore to create and generate new numbers and new groups, two things are needed: a set of rules and a set of numbers. From the same set of rules, numbers even evolve, propagate, and branch out into new entities and new families. They even propagate into new systems totally different from their original root or family as you will see later.

Interpretation:
Now, if instead of using 10 numbers, we use 2, 6, 8, and 16 numbers as the base of our counting system and use the same set of rules, will new numbers be created and generated as well?

Let us examine the Martian Number System. If Martians have six fingers, 3 on the right and 3 on the left, then their numerical system is made up of six numbers - 0,1,2,3,4,5. This assumption is based parallel to humans' 10 fingers that represent their 10 basic numbers. If we follow the same procedure of the base-10 system of generating numbers, the Martians matrix table will be:

From the table above, the Martian's counting system starts from 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5. However, instead of the numbers 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 following them, the numbers 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 come next after 5. Instead of 16, 17, 18 and 19, the numbers 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 come next after 15. Instead of 26, 27, 28, and 29, the numbers 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 follow next after 25. As the same set of rules is implemented over and over again, the Martian number system evolves and propagates forever in time just like Earthling's base-10 system.

Other interesting counting systems that yield numbers infinitely are the Binary and the Maya number systems. The Binary system utilizes only two numbers, 0 and 1, instead of six or ten numbers. With these 2 numbers, it can also generate (aside from numbers) new breeds of complex families like picture elements (pixels), computer programs (software), and smart robots (hardware) to name a few. The Maya number system, on the other hand, in essence, is a binary system with a twist. It comes also with two numbers in the form of solid objects - a stone(dot) and a stick(dash). The Stone represents a dot which is equivalent to One and the Stick a dash and equal to Five. With the number Zero, it is represented by a Shell. Although sticks, rocks, shells, leaves, and fingers were originally used for counting by our ancient ancestors, these pieces eventually evolved over time into various new systems like the smoke signals, the Morse code, and the complex worldwide web with rules.

Other numerical systems, invented by the Inca civilization, the Ancient Egyptians, the Mayans, the Greeks, the Babylonians, the Sumerians, and the Chinese, also evolved and propagated by following a set of rules. With an algorithm that guided their creations and evolutions, new entities and new families also existed. From all these systems, the set of instructions is the "creator" of the numerical world. A set of instructions is commonly known as the procedure. When rules or procedure is generally applied repeatedly to different conditions with the same outcome, it becomes a Law. The creation and evolution of the number system existed because of the Law. [Lawsin, 2000, Creation by Law]

Mayan Counting System

When I reached my teenage years, my fascination with numbers snowballed and skyrocketed to the next level. Equipped with my father’s geometry book, I learned to extrapolate postulates, axioms, theorems, corollaries, propositions, and algorithms. With all this knowledge, I discovered patterns in the origin, creation, and evolution of things like how a dot transforms into a line, then into a triangle, into a circular form, and into other dimensional figures using a set of rules. I even explored how equations were derived, formulated, and transformed into other equations, to the point I uncovered the formula for the Grand Unified Theory which was actually Newton's F=ma, the root formula from where most equations in physics originated. Even mathematical equations like pi are common laws of Nature. My infatuation with patterns and numbers even led me to formulate my own Pythagorean equation. With all of these interesting mental exercises, what caught my attention most was the fact that all the information in geometry was based on the geometrical shapes nature has already designed. The Universe is made up of shape and space. Shape and space are the building blocks that create everything and everyone. They are the root of everything. Everything started with the dualpairing of Shape and Space. (The comprehensive discussion of the theory of Space and Shape is in the book Originemology).

*Inscriptionist  - sometimes called Lawsinist, is an individual with a passion in seeking or hunting the natural laws of the universe. Inscriptionists are inspired to uncover the beauty and elegance of formulas, equations, and natural laws in every nook and cranny of the universe to unearth the central dogma of life known as the Single Theory of Everything. Inscriptionism is its philosophical doctrine.

"The building blocks of everything are made up of invisible shapes and empty spaces."
~ joey lawsin

Disclaimer: This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited as follows: Originemology, Joey Lawsin, 1988, USA.

Originemological Argument Against God

Drafted Mar 2000; revised Dec 2000
by Joey Lawsin

Does God has a beginning?

According to the Originemological Argument, "Everything has a beginning. The first beginning was there and was not there." 

Joey Lawsin, who authored this paradoxical argument, claims that the initial beginning emerges from something and nothing. The beginning was caused by both something and nothing, a space and a shape. These something and nothing subsequently evolve as inherent embedded inscriptions and intuitive materials on both physicals and abstracts.

Thus, if God has a beginning, He emerges from both something and nothing.

The basic form of the argument is as follows:

1. Everything has a beginning.

2. The beginning emerges from both something and nothing.

3. Therefore, God emerges from both something and nothing.

A modified structure of the argument is:

1. Everything exists because other things cause it to exist.

2. God exists.

3. Therefore, God exists because other things cause Him to exist.

This proposition is grounded in three core principles of originemology: the Inlearning Konstant, the Codexation Dilemma, and the First Law of Originemology (Lawsin, 1988).

1. The Think Paradigm

2. The Single Theory of Everything

3. The Codexation Dilemma

1. The first principle, known as The Inlearning Konstant (Think), states that information can only be acquired in two and only two ways: by choice and by chance. 

By Choice means information is obtained from parents, teachers, books, schools, friends, lessons from animals, or from nature. By Chance means information is acquired from discovering new things, fortunate accidents, unexpected experiences, unknown events, and nature's interventions. 

Regardless of the method, all information ultimately are acquired or borrowed originally from one's environment, from ones surrounding, from nature. Information originates from Mother Nature. Humans, animals, plants, and all things in the environment are individual pieces of information. Even their actions, forms, movements, and features constitute pieces of information that can be inlearned, imitated, or acquired by other humans, animals, and plants. 

Nature is the original source that supply information. Every piece of information, whether acquired by choice or chance, can be traced back to the natural world. Nature is the ultimate repository of information —the Mother of all Information. The acquisition of information by chance or by choice is referred to as Inlearning.

The abstract concept of gods can be traced back to early human interactions with nature. The genesis of this idea began with the first primeval human, who, like newborns, started with no pre-existing knowledge. Through curiosity, he began to explore his environment and gained information by choice or by chance. Using his senses, he acquired new pieces of information and expanded his horizons

Observing animal behavior, he mimicked these actions. He learned to kill like animals hunt their prey. He became dominant among animals. However, when confronted with the formidable forces of nature—such as lightning, thunder, rain, and the sun—he perceived these phenomena as manifestations of entities more powerful than him. This led to the belief in powerful beings controlling these natural events.

Over time, the idea of god evolved. God was conceptualized, worshiped, and their stories were passed down through generations. They were documented in texts, embraced by various cultures, and personified globally. God was born. He gave birth to god.  He codexated God. He made god. Man created God. 

2. The second principle, known as The Codexation Dilemma, asserts that a person can't think of something without associating it with a physical object. This principle underscores the interconnectedness of Humans' ideas and Nature's objects. The idea of an apple is real because it can be physically associated with an object that can be touched, seen, or tasted. The idea of a bird is real because it can be physically sensed when it flies playfully in the sky or chirps a beautiful song while sitting on a branch of a tree. The ideas of air, sound, temperature, and other invisible parameters are real because they can be detected by scientific instruments and can even be calculated using mathematical equations. Aside from association and detection, trees, birds, apples, flowers, thunder, air, and the universe have their own individual unique material of identification. 

God doesn't exist because his abstractness can't be associated with any objective reality, measured physically or even detected by precision instruments. God could not be associated with any objects because God himself has no personal unique physical identity. A thunder could not be a god because a thunder can be detected and has its own unique physical identity - a thunder. A flower could not be god, because a flower can be sensed and has its own unique material identity - a flower. The universe could not be god, because the universe can be both sensed, detected, and identified with its own unique physical concrete materials. Nature is nature. God could not be associated with any solid material because every physical object has already been identified individually with its own physical tangible uniqueness. If God is an idea that can't be transformed into physical reality and no material evidence can prove his existence physically, then God is not real. He is nothing but a mere notion... a concept ... a belief that resides only in the world of imagination. God is just an idea. Furthermore, if God is the only being before everything else, where did he get his ideas as proposed in the theory of the Caveman-in-the-Box Trilogy. How did he know the figures circle, square, triangle, and all other geometrical figures?   How did he determine that the planets should be round, that the Milky Way should be spiral, and that animals should be cylindrical? Where did he learn all these shapes? Did he live previously in a material world much like Earth? The theory that asserts the inability of abstract ideas to transform into physical realities without the material world is called the Codexation Dilemma.

3. The third principle is known as The First Law of Originemology. It posits that "Every beginning arises from both something and nothing." It is a natural law – a universal law that is experienced from the time of birth by everything and everyone including God (if he exists). 

Thus, if God is the beginning, he must evolve first from simple to complex. Seeds turn into trees, cells into humans, celestial elements into galaxies, and back to their "atomic" origins. If he has magical powers and created himself, then particle materials and building instructions must both exist first before he can create himself. Something has to come first - it's either god, materials, or instructions. If he popped out from nothing, then he contradicts the Single Theory of Everything. 

Also, no one can create something material without some materials at hand. This is The Zizo Effect (what zips in must zips out). Furthermore, no one can create anything without anything at hand. So to create god, something or maybe nothing or both must come first before him. If God has a beginning, then God has a source of origin, even a birthdate, a birthplace, or a family? 

But if God has no beginning and no end and infinitely existed, then it defies the Law of Originemology, the Law of Exponential Growth and Logarithmic Decay, and the Zizo Effect. Either his Existance is true or the Laws are false or vice versa.  But the Laws provides true concrete evidence while his Existance provides no evidence at all. Where is God? If God is nowhere to be found, therefore, God doesn't exist. The discipline that studies the roots or source of origin of everything and everyone is called Originemology

Thus, the notion of God is an enduringly imaginary construct. Despite its persistence in human discourse, no empirical evidence or concrete object beyond the confines of the mind substantiates God’s abstract nature. This presents a Codexation Dilemma: God defies association with anything in the natural world. The inherent physical identities and properties of natural phenomena clash with the divine persona and supernatural attributes attributed to God. It is an Identity Crisis—a tension between the conceptual and the corporeal.

If we trace the original idea of God back to its roots, we find that it emerged from our interactions with nature. Early humans, devoid of pre-existing knowledge, explored their environment. Curiosity led them to acquire information through sensory perception. They observed animal behavior, mimicked actions, and learned survival strategies. Yet, encounters with natural forces—lightning, thunder, rain—hinted at something beyond the tangible. Thus, the abstract concept of gods was born.

However, this divine abstraction remains confined to the mind. God exists as a mental impression, a concept, a notion—forever elusive in the realm of codexation. Without unique identification through association, detection, and tangible representation, God remains intangible.

In conclusion, abstract ideas attain legitimacy when they are linked to tangible objects, thereby manifesting as physical reality. This concept is encapsulated in what is known as the Dualpairing of Reality; the Law of Codexation. The idea of god remains an imaginary idea even today as we speak because no physical object or solid evidence outside the mind can transform god's abstractness into physical reality; A Codexation Dilemma. God could not even be associated with anything in nature, since all things in nature have their own physical identities and properties that conflict with the divine persona and supernatural attributes of God; An Identity Crisis. If the original idea of god was borrowed from nature, created by man, and can't be represented by any physical object, then God exists only in the mind. He is a mental impression ... a concept ... a notion .... that will never ever be codexated. If God can't be uniquely identified by association, detection, and codexation, lo and behold, God doesn't exist. 

A side note: While ideas originate from humans, their abstraction becomes tangible when linked to material objects. Consider gravity—an invisible force, yet detectable through instruments and mathematical equations. Love, too, is abstract, yet its sensation arises when two consenting individuals share a magical connection. Democracy, an abstract concept, finds physical representation in the collective mass of people constituting a government and the laws they enact. In contrast, God, despite being symbolically represented by devoted communities and divine laws, eludes physical detection. God will always remain an abstract idea because Man created God.

Note: The Illusion of Reality and the Lawsinium Fallacy are the other two assertions offered by the author that prove God doesn't exist. A thorough discussion of these topics can be found in the book Originemology.

The Beginning Argument

" The First Law of Originemology states that 

"Everything has a beginning. It emerges from both something and nothing.”

~ Joey Lawsin

About the Author :

Joey Lawsin is the author behind the new school of thought "Inscription by Design". He is a revisionist who wants to change the world by rewriting the textbooks with new concepts that debunk the old scientific, theological, and philosophical ideas of antiquity. He published a book in Physics, created a conscious machine known as Autognorics, and formulated the Mother of all Theories "The Single Theory of Everything". The article above is an excerpt from his book "The Bible Proves God Does not Exist".

Disclaimer: This article is intellectual property. The author retains the copyright to most of the research materials on this site unless cited otherwise. Some of the articles are edited on a day-to-day basis without notice and incorrect spelling, punctuation, and grammar can be found in any of the documents. If you are interested in using any of these works for the purpose of scholarly discussion or study, please first inform the author by email or cite the author's name or source as follows: A Journal of a Creative Mind, Joey Lawsin, 1988, USA.

#originemology, #codexation dilemma, #autognorics, #interim emergence, #inscription by design

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

The Philosophy of Joey Lawsin

Joey Lawsin's brain

Most of Joey Lawsin's scientific, theological, and philosophical works are collected in his books. Scientifically, his research interest focuses primarily on the Single Theory of Everything, technically named Generated Emergence. It posits that everything like consciousness, life, and self are all nothing but illusions that seem to exist only because other things cause them to exist. His central controlling idea is threefold. First is the Codexation Dilemma. The theory claims that abstract ideas cannot be codified or transformed into physical realities without the external material inherent world. Second, Originemology. The study that postulates Nature is the brain, mother, and keeper of information and information flows only in one direction - from external nature to the internal mind. Third, Inscription by Design, a theory that asserts that everything is an intuitive object with embedded information that, when energized, causes the animated phenomenon we humans call Reality. 

Theologically, he beautifully formulated various new revolutionary schools of thought on creation, evolution, Life, God, and the bible. Topics like how men created god, why reality is an illusion, who or what created everyone and everything, and why the bible provides concrete evidence that God doesn't exist are all comprehensively argued and rationally explained in his books. Philosophically, he advances old philosophical views mastered by well-known philosophers and scholars to new heights of ideological paradigms like Nature or Nurture, I think, therefore I am, and the Consciousness Dictum. His books also contain original paradoxical quotations, all of which are rooted eventually in his series of experiments and common sense investigations. Joey believes Life is more of Chemistry than biology, where every chemical element is made up of each own unique instruction. As a progressive humanist, he actively promotes a cause encouraging humankind to set aside their belief systems, which they have learned, copied, or borrowed from the ancient past; and reorganize as one race in order to move forward quickly into the future of space exploration and save humanity; and restore mother earth to her pristine abundance before modern civilization becomes history.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Evolution of Creation
​ISBN: 978-1-60047-393-7

Evolution of Creation provides intriguing concepts about “God” as part of and parcel of the creation process. The book also gives logical reasons and supporting evidence against the false notions of evolution theories that fall on the same common misconceptions that a single organism, a single particle, or single alien species gave birth to the entire universe. We examined, argued, and straightened up the misunderstandings in Chapter 3. The chapter also reveals how the natural dualpairing of Materials and Instructions created the universe.

Chapter 2 demonstrates a remarkable rational approach that suggests ape can evolve to man or a more controversial case from mud (non-living) to man (living things) without actually presenting any fossilized transitional "missing link". Chapter 6 provides some astonishing out-of-body experiences encountered in life by the author that debunk the idea of soul or spirit. Chapter 4 introduces the evolution of numbers, formulas, and dimensions; and unfold the formula derivations behind the Theory of Dualpairing and the Theory of Everything. Chapter 1 explores other popular evolutionary theories about how the universe was created by divine creation, biological evolution, natural interventions, and information materialization.

In Chapter 5, the origin of life by dualpairing is explained. Viegenesis, a term coined to describe the process of creation by the dualpairing of spontaneous instructions and vitalic materials, is the highlight of this chapter.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Originemology
eBook - lulu.com

​Originemology is the science behind the beginning of everything. It is a new school of thought, a pioneering scientific discipline that comprehensively studies the origin, creation, and evolution of everything. In a nutshell, Originemology is the science that deals with the "study of the origin of origins" and the "Law of Generated Emergence".

Specifically, its integral component is twofold: first, it examines the birth of all notions, ideas, or concepts made-up by men like information, language, ideas, behaviors, emotions, gods, tools; and second, it examines the roots of everything created by nature like the universe, elements, plants, animals, through generated emergence.

In a broader sense, Originemology is a cross-interdisciplinary study based on anthropology, archaeology, geography, and chronology. Its main objective is to trace backward systematically the primal source or origin of an idea from being a single elemental entity to an emerging complex structure using the following research questions:
1. Who gave birth to the idea?
2. When was the notion first conceptualized?
3. Where was the notion first conceptualized
4. How did the concept originate?
5. Why was the idea created in the first place?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Creation by Law
ISBN-978-1-60047-217-6

​The book, Creation by Law, provides an astonishing revelation about how the universe was created, neither by God nor by Evolution, but by a set of acquired natural tasks known as The Law of Systemic Instructions.

Like putting on a new pair of spectacles, the book introduces eye-opening concepts on why things exist in pairs, how the universe was created by a set of laws, and why every object is an instruction. It also authoritatively demonstrates the exponential transformation of species and propagation of “life” from non-living to living based on the Seven Laws of the Creation Process.

The Law of Dualpairing, which is one of the requirements of Creation and Evolution, provides revealing insights into why a two of something must exist in order to produce new families of species. Without the "Twoness", the dualpairing of Vitalic Materials and Systemic Instructions, the course of the creation process will collapse. Nothing will propagate. Life is dead!

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Bible Proves God Doesn't Exist
eBook - Authorsden.com
​
The bible and the church are the only two influential forces that claim there is a GOD. Aside from the Bible, there is no other evidence everywhere that provides proof of the existence of this Divine Being. Without the bible, the three main religions: Judaism, Catholicism, and Islam, all of which originated from the Arab world, will never even exist. The Bible is the only available source of information that suggests God exists. But it also provides evidence God doesn't exist.

In this book, evidence upon evidence - inaccuracies, errors, wrongdoings, and conflicting events found in the bible - are meticulously exposed. One example is the 7 days of the divine creation that empirically doesn't agree with what science offers today. Other glaring errors, like the conflicting attributes of this divine being to be almighty, with unlimited knowledge, present in all places, and creator of everything - are logically examined to showcase his imperfections. Moreover, opposing biblical verses, fictitious personalities that can only found in fairytale books, the mass killings made by God to thousands of innocent people and animals, and the chronological origins of all religions in the world with their founders are also discussed in the book.

Paradoxically, with these errors, inaccuracies, contradictions found everywhere in the bible - pieces of evidence that damage the authenticity of the bible and the authority of God - could the bible be instead of the sinister work of the devil? After reading the book, you be the judge!

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Man Created God
Free ebook in pdf format

​Does God exist?

According to the Originemological Argument, God does not exist. This conclusion was based on three basic lawsinic principles: the Information Materialization, the Codexation Dilemma, and the Origin of Information.

​The idea of god remains an imaginary concept even today, as we speak, because of the fact that there is no physical object or solid evidence that represents god's abstractness into physical reality. A Codexation Dilemma. God cannot even be associated with anything in nature, since everything in nature possesses individual physical identities and properties that do not match the divine persona and supernatural attributes of God. An Identity Crisis. Furthermore, God was conceptualized by man. The idea of gods was borrowed from nature. Eventually, these Gods became one God. A concept created by Man.

The book also provides new fascinating ideas that support the argument that God doesn't exist. They are based on how humans acquire information, develop ideas, and transform them into real objects that are not inherent from nature, and that came first before the mind. Examples of these concepts are the cosmogenical, originemological, phrenological, and God's Boring arguments. They are empirically discussed in the book that supports the notion Man created God!

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Learn Piano in One Day
paperback - Lulu.com

The primary goal of Piano Equation is to teach you how to PLAY PIANO in JUST ONE DAY. That's right! In just one day, you will learn to play your first 2 piano songs on the keyboard with both hands.

The book comes with twelve short lessons. Each lesson has drawings and diagrams that are easily understood. It also includes 10 delightful piano songs. These melodies are “Kid Tested and Kid Approved.” They are systematically prearranged, from easy to difficult, to provide consistency in introducing notes and chords.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Paraduoxical Quotations
eBook - Amazon.com

The book is my personal compilation of riddles, poems, quotes, songs, sayings, and touches of humor originally extracted from all of my works, scientific or otherwise. It is paraduoxical (paradoxical) in nature.

A Paraduoxical Quotation is two statements that appear opposite or contradictory but upon close examination, presents a logical sense of complimentary.

One example of such a paradox quote is "The more you let your mind go, the better you come to understand more".

Other interesting topics included in the book that might blow your mind away are the counter-intuitive riddles like Reality is an Illusion, Consciousness doesn't come from the brain, and Life is chemistry, not biology. These radical ideas are fully explained in the book.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Organizing Humanity
eBook - Amazon.com

This is a futuristic epic of one man named Wylzan who discovered a simple unknown theory that eventually reinvented the meaning of life and revolutionized the historical transitions of the world — from the Stone Age to the Industrial Age to the Information Age and to what now hailed as the Family Age. In this new era "Life is 10% Work and 90% Merriment".

Wylzan is the pseudonym of an award-winning investigative biophysicist, a brilliant abiotronic engineer, and an accomplished originemologist. His empirical discoveries and immense knowledge on matters such as viegenesis, abiozoics, dimetrix, astral projection, time travel, associative intelligence, aneural consciousness, and the Nth space of dimensions, made him known all around the world. His technical expertise in the fields of programmable logic circuitry, pneumatics, hydraulics, digital electronics, telemetry, computer architecture, and software programming made him a brilliant inventor, an Imagineer, and a philanthropist. His works on Originemology, Inscription by Design, Embedded Information, and Generated Emergence led him to the discovery of the Single Theory of Everything, which influenced and changed the social norms of humanity. His pioneering quest on building self-living machines known as ELFS (engineered life-forms) earned him the title the "Father of Autognorics".

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Lawsinism \Law`[sin^]*ism\, n.

1: the theoretical doctrine on creation by embedded inscriptions and intuitive objects.
2: the theory of creation by the dualpairing of systemic instruction and vitalic material.
3: the Law of Seven Inscriptions. The Law.
4: Inscriptionism / Inscriptionalism
5: the Information Codexation: Abstracts to Physical

6: the belief that Everything exists only because other things exist.

7: the Single Theory of Everything: the Law of Generated Interim Emergence.

8: the Theory of Inscription by Design

*Inscriptionist  - sometimes called Lawsinist, is an individual with a passion in seeking or hunting the natural laws of the universe. Inscriptionists are inspired to uncover the beauty and elegance of formulas, equations, and natural laws in every nook and cranny of the universe to unearth the central dogma of life known as the Single Theory of Everything. Inscriptionism is its philosophical doctrine. 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------