The Origin of Origins

What is Orignemology?

Originemology is a concept developed by Joey Lawsin that means the study of origins. It combines linguistic roots to capture the idea of tracing everything back to its first cause:

Originem (Latin) → “origin” or “beginning.”

Onoma (Greek) → “name.”

Logos (Greek) → “study” or “reason.”

Together, Originemology becomes a discipline that looks at beginnings not only in the material sense (matter, particles, physical reality) but also in the instructional sense (patterns, codes, knowledge, meaning). It asks: Where does anything truly begin?

Unlike traditional etymology (which studies the origin of words) or ontology (which studies the nature of being), Originemology is broader. It treats beginnings as puzzles, where both intuitive material and embedded instruction, known as the Theory of Inscription by Design, are essential in the creation process. It is neither purely science nor purely philosophy, but a fusion of both.

So, Originemology is essentially the origin of beginnings — the search for the seed and rule from which all things grow and develop.

The Origin of Language

Every civilization begins with words. Before cities, before machines, before laws, there was language. It is the first tool of thought, the bridge between imagination and reality.  

At its origin, language was not written or spoken in the way we know today. It began as gestures, sounds, and markings—primitive signals that carried meaning. A raised hand could warn of danger. A carved symbol could mark ownership. A rhythmic chant could unite a tribe. These were the seeds of communication.  

Over time, these seeds grew into systems. Sounds became syllables, syllables became words, and words became sentences. Each step added structure, allowing humans not only to share information but to preserve memory, to tell stories, and to pass knowledge across generations.  

Language evolved alongside human needs. In trade, it became numbers. In law, it became codes. In art, it became poetry. In science, it became formulas. Every discipline carries within it the origin of language, reshaped to serve its purpose.  

But the true origin of language lies deeper than utility. It is rooted in identity. To name something is to give it existence. To speak a word is to make it real. In this way, language is not just a tool—it is creation itself.  

Originemology teaches us that by tracing language back to its beginnings, we uncover the moment when thought first became sound, when imagination first became shared, and when humanity first began to build worlds together.

The Origin of Numbers

Every society begins by counting. Before alphabets, before machines, before laws, there was the need to measure and compare. Numbers are among humanity’s oldest inventions, born not from theory but from necessity.  

At their origin, numbers were not symbols on paper. They were marks on bones, scratches on stone, knots in rope, or tallies carved into wood. Each mark represented something tangible: a sheep in the flock, a day that had passed, a measure of grain stored for winter. Numbers began as memory aids, tools to keep track of life’s essentials.  

Over time, these marks evolved into systems. Simple tallies became groupings, groupings became symbols, and symbols became numerals. The leap from counting objects to abstract representation was revolutionary. It allowed humans to think beyond the immediate, to calculate, to plan, and to imagine quantities that did not yet exist.  

Different cultures created their own seeds of number systems. The Babylonians used base‑60, the Mayans base‑20, and the Romans their famous numerals carved into stone. Each system reflected the environment and needs of its people, yet all shared the same origin: the human impulse to measure and order the world.  

Numbers did not remain confined to counting. They grew into mathematics, the language of patterns and relationships. With numbers, humans could chart the stars, measure land, and build monuments. They became the foundation of trade, science, and technology.  

At their core, numbers remind us of the originemological principle: from a simple seed, infinite worlds can grow. A single tally mark on a bone evolved into equations that describe galaxies. What began as a scratch in stone became the digital codes that power modern civilization.  

Numbers are proof that origins matter. They show how the smallest beginnings—marks, tallies, seeds—can expand into universes of meaning.  

The Origin of Identity

Every origin story eventually turns inward. Beyond language and numbers lies something even more fundamental: identity. To know the world, we must first know ourselves.  

At its origin, identity was simple. It began with recognition: the ability to distinguish one thing from another. A hunter recognized his tribe from strangers. A mother recognized her child’s face. A mark on a stone distinguished ownership. These acts of recognition were the seeds of identity.  

Over time, recognition grew into naming. To give something a name was to grant it permanence. Names carried memory, lineage, and belonging. They became symbols of selfhood, binding individuals to families, tribes, and communities. Identity was no longer just recognition; it became meaning.  

Identity evolved alongside culture. In rituals, it became roles. In trade, it became reputation. In law, it became citizenship. In philosophy, it became the question of the self. Each layer added complexity, but each layer traced back to the same origin: the human need to define and distinguish.  

At its core, identity is both personal and collective. It tells us who we are, but also who we are among others. It is the origin of society, the foundation of morality, and the spark of individuality. Without identity, there is no belonging, no responsibility, no story.  

Originemology teaches us that identity is not fixed; it is an evolving origin. It begins with recognition, grows through naming, and expands into meaning. From a simple mark or sound, it becomes the vast architecture of selfhood that shapes civilizations.  

The Origin of Inlearning

Before language, before numbers, before identity, there was inlearning. It is the oldest origin, the quiet process by which life absorbed knowledge without conscious thought. Inlearning was not instinct, but experience carried forward, behaviors inherited from parents and passed down through countless generations.  

At its origin, inlearning was simple. A bird learned to build a nest by watching others. A fish learned to swim upstream by following the current of its kind. A human learned to flee from fire or fight for food by observing the tribe. These were not automatic reflexes, but lessons etched into memory and repeated until they became second nature. Inlearning was the first teacher, shaping life without explanation.  

Over time, inlearning grew into patterns. Hunger became agriculture. Shelter became architecture. Fear became caution, and curiosity became exploration. What began as imitation evolved into knowledge, and knowledge grew into innovation. Inlearning was the seed from which wisdom sprouted.  

Even today, inlearning remains at the core of human experience. It guides decisions, warns in danger, and inspires creativity. It is the origin of intuition, the quiet voice that emerges from generations of accumulated lessons.  

Originemology reveals inlearning as the foundation of progress. It is both ancient and immediate, both inherited and essential. It reminds us that beneath every equation, every invention, every civilization lies a simple truth: we learn from those before us, and in that learning, we create the future.  

The Origin of Everything

According to Joey Lawsin’s Theory on Inscription by Design, existence is not born from matter alone. It arises from the union of matter and instruction. Matter provides the substance, the raw material of reality. Instruction provides the design, the embedded code in matter that guides how matter behaves, interacts, and evolves.  

This union is what Lawsin calls Inscriptionism. Matter, by itself, is inert. Instruction, by itself, is abstract. But when the two are combined, they generate form, function, and meaning. Every particle, every living cell, every system carries within it inscriptions—patterns that dictate how it will act, replicate, or transform.  

In this view, existence are not accidents. They are engineered. The universe is not simply a collection of objects but a network of embedded instructions. These inscriptions are what allow matter to organize into atoms, atoms into molecules, molecules into life, and life into consciousness.  

Lawsin’s framework shows that creation is always dual:  

- Material is the medium.  

- Inscription is the message.  

Together, they form the architecture of existence. Without matter, there is nothing to hold. Without instruction, there is nothing to follow. But united, they become the seed of reality itself.  

Originemology embraces this principle by treating beginnings as puzzles of both substance and script. To study origins is not only to ask what exists, but also what guides existence. Matter is the canvas, instruction the inscription upon it. And in their union lies the true origin of creation.  

The articles and answers to the following questions listed are found in the book Originemology. 

(i) How did languages evolve?

(ii) How did numbers evolve?
(iii) How did information evolve?
(iv) How did equations evolve?
(v) How did measurements evolve?
(vi) How did intelligence evolve?
(vii) How did computers evolve?
(viii) How did religions evolve?
(ix) How did machines evolve?
(x) How did reality evolve?
(xi) How did life evolve?
(xii) How did everything evolve?

      "Nothing exists unless something causes it to exist." ~ Joey Lawsin

About the Author :

Joey Lawsin is the author of the book "Originemology". He is a reformist who wants to change the world by rewriting the textbooks with new concepts that debunk the old scientific, theological, and philosophical ideas of antiquity. He published a book in Physics, created a conscious machine known as Biotronics, and formulated a new school of thought known as "Exyzforms". The concept was discovered from "The Biotronics Project".