Pages

Showing posts with label Man created God. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Man created God. Show all posts

Friday, July 27, 2012

Originemological Argument

Drafted Mar 2000; revised Dec 2000
by Joey Lawsin

Does God exist?

According to the Originemological Argument, God does not exist. The conclusion is based on three basic lawsinic principles: the Inlearning Konstant, the Codexation Dilemma, and the First Law of Originemology [Lawsin 1988].

1. The first principle, known as The Inlearning Konstant (Think), states that information can only be acquired by humans in two and only two ways: by choice and by chance. By Choice, information is obtained from parents, teachers, books, schools, friends, lessons from animals, or from nature. By Chance, information arises from discovering new things, fortunate accidents, unexpected experiences, unknown events, and nature's interventions. Regardless of the method, all information ultimately are acquired or borrowed originally from one's environment, a part of nature. Information comes from Nature. Humans, animals, plants, and other things in the environment are individual pieces of information. Even their actions, forms, movements, and features constitute pieces of information that can be inlearned, imitated, or acquired by other humans, animals, and plants. Nature is the original sources that supply information. Every piece of information, whether acquired by choice or chance, can be traced back to the external world. Nature, as the collective external world, emerges as the ultimate repository—the Mother of all Information. The acquisition of information by chance or by choice is called Inlearning.

The abstract idea of gods came from nature as well. The original source can be traced back to how humans interacted with nature. It started when the very first primeval man, without a piece of single information in his mind, like the minds of all newly born babies, interacted with his surroundings. Through curiosity, he began to explore his environment and gained information by choice or by chance. Using his senses, he acquired new pieces of information and expanded his horizons. He observed how animals behave and mimicked their behaviors. He learned to kill like animals hunting their prey to eat. He learned to survive against all odds. He became powerful among the animals. But when he experienced the physical power of lightning, thunder, rain, and the sun, he thought that something or someone was more powerful than him. He thought these natural events were acts of some powerful beings and over time the idea of gods evolved. God was conceptualized, worshiped, passed on from father to son over generations, written and printed on texts, embraced by cultures, and personified all over the world. God was born. He gave birth to a god.  He codexated God. He made god. Man created God. 

2. The second principle, known as The Codexation Dilemma, asserts that a person can't think of something without associating it with a physical object. This principle underscores the interconnectedness of Humans' ideas and Nature's objects. The idea of an apple is real because it can be physically associated with an object that can be touched, seen, or tasted. The idea of a bird is real because it can be physically sensed when it flies playfully in the sky or chirps a beautiful song while sitting on a branch of a tree. The ideas of air, sound, temperature, and other invisible parameters are real because they can be detected by scientific instruments and can even be calculated using mathematical equations. Aside from association and detection, trees, birds, apples, flowers, thunder, air, and the universe have their own individual unique material of identification. 

God doesn't exist because his abstractness can't be associated with any objective reality, measured physically or even detected by precision instruments. God could not be associated with any objects because God himself has no personal unique physical identity. A thunder could not be a god because a thunder can be detected and has its own unique physical identity - a thunder. A flower could not be god, because a flower can be sensed and has its own unique material identity - a flower. The universe could not be god, because the universe can be both sensed, detected, and identified with its own unique physical concrete materials. Nature is nature. God could not be associated with any solid material because every physical object has already been identified individually with its own physical tangible uniqueness. If God is an idea that can't be transformed into physical reality and no material evidence can prove his existence physically, then God is not real. He is nothing but a mere notion... a concept ... a belief that resides only in the world of imagination. God is just an idea. Furthermore, if God is the only being before everything else, where did he get his ideas as proposed in the theory of the Caveman-in-the-Box Trilogy. How did he know the figures circle, square, triangle, and all other geometrical figures?   How did he determine that the planets should be round, that the Milky Way should be spiral, and that animals should be cylindrical? Where did he learn all these shapes? Did he live previously in a material world much like Earth? The theory that asserts the inability of abstract ideas to transform into physical realities without the material world is called the Codexation Dilemma.

3. The third principle is known as The First Law of Originemology. It posits that everything has a beginning. It is a natural law – a universal law that is experienced from the time of birth by everything and everyone including God (if he exists). It was just the beginning was there and was not there.

Thus, if God is the beginning, he must evolve first from simple to complex. Seeds turn into trees, cells into humans, celestial elements into galaxies, and back to their "atomic" origins. If he has magical powers and created himself, then particle materials and building instructions must both exist first before he can create himself. Something has to come first - it's either god, materials, or instructions. If he popped out from nothing, then he contradicts the Single Theory of Everything. 

Also, no one can create something material without some materials at hand. This is The Zizo Effect (what zips in must zips out). Furthermore, no one can create anything without anything at hand. So to create god, something or maybe nothing or both must come first before him. If God has a beginning, then God has a source of origin, even a birthdate, a birthplace, or a family? But if God has no beginning and no end and has existed always, then it defies the Law of Originemology, the Law of Exponential Growth and Logarithmic Decay, and the Zizo Effect. Either his Existance is true or the Laws are false or vice versa But The Laws provides true concrete evidence while his Existance provides no evidence at all. Where is God? If God is nowhere to be found, therefore, God doesn't exist. The discipline that studies the roots or source of origin of everything and everyone is called Originemology

Thus, the notion of God is an enduringly imaginary construct. Despite its persistence in human discourse, no empirical evidence or concrete object beyond the confines of the mind substantiates God’s abstract nature. This presents a Codexation Dilemma: God defies association with anything in the natural world. The inherent physical identities and properties of natural phenomena clash with the divine persona and supernatural attributes attributed to God. It is an Identity Crisis—a tension between the conceptual and the corporeal.

If we trace the original idea of God back to its roots, we find that it emerged from our interactions with nature. Early humans, devoid of pre-existing knowledge, explored their environment. Curiosity led them to acquire information through sensory perception. They observed animal behavior, mimicked actions, and learned survival strategies. Yet, encounters with natural forces—lightning, thunder, rain—hinted at something beyond the tangible. Thus, the abstract concept of gods was born.

However, this divine abstraction remains confined to the mind. God exists as a mental impression, a concept, a notion—forever elusive in the realm of codexation. Without unique identification through association, detection, and tangible representation, God remains intangible.

In conclusion, abstract ideas attain legitimacy when they are linked to tangible objects, thereby manifesting as physical reality. This concept is encapsulated in what is known as the Dualpairing of Reality; the Law of Codexation. The idea of god remains an imaginary idea even today as we speak because no physical object or solid evidence outside the mind can transform god's abstractness into physical reality; A Codexation Dilemma. God could not even be associated with anything in nature, since all things in nature have their own physical identities and properties that conflict with the divine persona and supernatural attributes of God; An Identity Crisis. If the original idea of god was borrowed from nature, created by man, and can't be represented by any physical object, then God exists only in the mind. He is a mental impression ... a concept ... a notion .... that will never ever be codexated. If God can't be uniquely identified by association, detection, and codexation, lo and behold, God doesn't exist. 

A side note: While ideas originate from humans, their abstraction becomes tangible when linked to material objects. Consider gravity—an invisible force, yet detectable through instruments and mathematical equations. Love, too, is abstract, yet its sensation arises when two consenting individuals share a magical connection. Democracy, an abstract concept, finds physical representation in the collective mass of people constituting a government and the laws they enact. In contrast, God, despite being symbolically represented by devoted communities and divine laws, eludes physical detection. God will always remain an abstract idea because Man created God.

Note: The Illusion of Reality and the Lawsinium Fallacy are the other two assertions offered by the author that prove God doesn't exist. A thorough discussion of these topics can be found in the book Originemology.




" The First Law of Originemology states that everything has a beginning. 
It is a universal law experienced by everything and everyone including God
~ Joey Lawsin


About the Author :

Joey Lawsin is the author behind the new school of thought "Originemology". He is a revisionist who wants to change the world by rewriting the textbooks with new concepts that debunk the old scientific, theological, and philosophical ideas of antiquity. He published a book in Physics, created a conscious machine known as Biotronics, and formulated the assertion on "The Originemological Argument". The article above is an excerpt from his book "The Bible Proves God Does not Exist".



Disclaimer: This article is intellectual property. The author retains the copyright to most of the research materials on this site unless cited otherwise. Some of the articles are edited on a day-to-day basis without notice and incorrect spelling, punctuation, and grammar can be found in any of the documents. If you are interested in using any of these works for the purpose of scholarly discussion or study, please first inform the author by email or cite the author's name or source as follows: A Journal of a Creative Mind, Joey Lawsin, 1988, USA.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 

Sunday, March 20, 2011

Man Created God

First drafted 2010 Revised 2011
by Joey Lawsin


Judaism believes that...
      ..... Jesus is NOT the Son of God.
Islam believes that...
      ..... Jesus is NOT the Son of God….. However,
Christianism believes that...
      ..... Jesus IS the Son of God.

So, who among these three is telling the truth?

Here are some answers excerpted from the book Man Created God:

It is quite strange to perceive that although there are three major religions in the world, Christianity is the only religious group that believes Jesus Christ is the son of god. Judaism and Islam never ever believe that Jesus is the son of god. 

This concern is alarming because the bible claims that there is only one God, one Bible, and one Church. If Judaism and Islam do not believe in Jesus, then they are absolutely not with God and with their bibles. If this is the case, then the true Bible is in the hands of the Catholics. But the first bible, the true word of god, originated from Judaism. So, Judaism has the authentic Bible. If this is now the case, then Jesus is not part of the Judeans bible, and therefore the Catholics are not the true church. 

Although the name Jesus Christ was never been mentioned in the Old Testament nor even in other holy scriptures outside the Christian denominations, its faithful still believe that Jesus is the son of god. So, is Jesus really the Son of God?

In Matthew 26:64 Jesus the Christ admitted he was the son of man….And, in John 10:29-30 Jesus admitted he was God himself…. However, no passage in the bible speaks about Jesus admitting he is the Son of God.

In Matthew 3:17 and Mark 1:11, Jesus never proclaimed he was the son of god, but some "voice from heaven" (something supernatural) proclaimed the title.

Hebrew 7:3 does not pertain to Jesus but Melchizedek who was believed also to be the son of god.

John 1:1-14, where the verses are poetic in nature - a Christological hymn. The verses are simply testimony by John and not by god (This again can be possibly falsified).

From all these verses, Jesus never ever declared that he was the son of god. The declarations were coming from the people; from the Pharisees, the disciples, the soldiers. They were the ones who labeled Jesus as the son of god. No concrete evidence shows Christ admitted he is the son of god.

In Matthew 26:63 -- "But Jesus held his peace. And the high priest said to him: I adjure thee by the living God, that thou tell us if thou be the Christ the Son of God." - here, the high priest asked him if he was the son of god. I thought Jesus would respond that he is the son of god, but surprisingly reading the next verse below, HE DID NOT!

Matthew 26:64 -- Jesus saith to him: Thou hast said it. Nevertheless, I say to you, hereafter you shall see the Son of man sitting on the right hand of the power of God and coming in the clouds of heaven. - Here, Jesus simply said, "You said it, not me".

Although Jesus proclaimed God as his father, this does not mean that he is the "parental or biological" father. This is like praying to god. Someone might be saying "Father (which means god or Jesus) forgive me for my sins ...." Or,  "Blessed me Father (which could mean priest or god) for I have sinned, ....". Thus, again, Jesus could or couldn't be God's son.

John 10:36 Why then do you accuse me of blasphemy because I said, 'I am God's Son'? Here, Jesus is simply suggesting that he can be the Son of God and/or the Son of Man. Either Joseph is his father, or he is of divine descent.

In John 10:22-42, Jesus was simply saying what other people say about him. It was their impressions. Jesus did not declare he was the son of god but he simply reiterated what other people thought of him ( you said ...."I am the son of god?").....And take note ......his statement was in question form...Hence, no doubt.... he is a man and he is a god .... but not the son of god.

Romans 1:4.....He was "declared to be the Son of God with power ...according to the Spirit of holiness...by the resurrection from the dead"...

If the Bible speaks that Jesus is both man and a god, then He is a demigod, a lesser divine being, a minor deity.

Who is this Man? Who is the Son of God?

He made blind men see, raised the dead, and walked on water. Three miracles when interpreted literally could be taken to be true. But they can also be interpreted allegorically. The story of the blind men could be a lesson for people to see the blessings surrounding them. The story of raising the dead could be interpreted as an awakening for those in a spiritual sleep. And the parable of walking on the water could be the power of will - that man can do things that are unusual or uncommon compared to the normal.

The title Son of God was deliberately attached as a title or label by the people and not by Jesus himself. Here are some examples that support this claim.

Matthew 4:6 "If you are the Son of God," he said, "throw yourself down. The devil tempted Jesus.

Matthew 8:29 "What do you want with us, Son of God?" they shouted. The demons knew he was the Son of God.

Matthew 14:32-33 And when they climbed into the boat, the wind died down. Then those who were in the boat worshiped him, saying "Truly you are the Son of God."

Matthew 26:63-64 The high priest said to him, "I charge you under oath by the living God: Tell us if you are the Christ, the Son of God." "Yes, it is as you say, "Jesus replied.

Matthew 16:15-17 "But what about you?" he asked. "Who do you say I am?" Simon Peter answered, "You are the Christ, the Son of the living God." Jesus replied, "Blessed are you, Simon son of Jonah, for this was not revealed to you by man, but my Father in heaven."

In Luke 10:21-22: Jesus was praising his god. He called this god Lord of Heaven, The Father, and not his father.

Matthew 7:21 "Not everyone who says to me, 'Lord, Lord,' will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only he who does the will of my Father who is in heaven."

Matthew 10:32-33 "Whoever acknowledges me before men, I will also acknowledge him before my Father in heaven. But whoever disowns me before men, I will disown him before my Father in heaven."

Matthew 11:27All things have been committed to me by my Father. No one knows the Son except the Father, and no one knows the Father except the Son and those to whom the Son chooses to reveal him.

John 3:16 says " For God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten son, that whosoever believeth on Him should not perish, but have everlasting life ".

The story behind John 3:18 does not even say that Jesus is the son of god. The story is a conversation between Jesus and Nicodemus where Jesus was pointing out that god is sending his son to save the world.

In reading the bible, remember that these are personal accounts of the writers - the gospel according to John or the gospel according to Luke.....and not according to God or Jesus himself. Remember, Jesus never wrote the bible. They are simply personal accounts and interpretations written by ancient scribes. These biblical writers are simply telling the story of a man named Jesus. They are simply storytelling.

Now, what does .... according to John......mean? Does this mean someone is writing about John's accounts or it was John who is telling his own accounts?

From The Women's Encyclopedia of Myths and Secrets:

YAHWEH, the word for Lord, was derived from YHWH.

Yahweh, the Hebrew name for Lord or God, was a vocalization of the Tetragrammaton. It was rendered parallel with Yah, Yahu, Jahveh, Jahi,  Jehovah, and the  Canaanite moon deity Yareah (an androgynous being). Yahweh could either be male or female. In the Canaan myth, there was a male Yahweh who was married to the Canaanite mother goddess Anat at Elephantine. Another very ancient Goddess appearing in Persian scriptures as the maker and seducer of the first man was Jahi. Like many other Creatresses, she mated with the primal serpent and gave the menstrual "blood of life" to Eve.

Scholars said that this four-letter word could not even be pronounced since they are simply letters without vowels and therefore could mean anything else. If allowed, the pronunciation would be Jehovah and not Yahweh. Its original name actually came from YHW which was pronounced as "Yahoo" by the Sashu.

ELOHIM is a Hebrew word that is plural of EL.

In Genesis 1, the word god, in the phrase "In the beginning God", when translated to Hebrew (Bereshit bara Elohim et hashamayim ve'et ha'arets) becomes ELOHIM (the plural form for God). This means when the universe was created there were TWO GODS at least working together.

In the original manuscripts of the book of Genesis, Yahweh was only one of the Elohim. Sometimes the singular form was taken as a name, e.g. the Phoenician bull-god called simply El, "the god." In Medieval times, it was thought Elohim was one of the magical secret names of God; or, at times, it was taken to be the name of a devil. Elohim could also be interpreted as God The Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit. Three persons in one God.

This practice can be found among the Faithful. They usually pray either to the Holy Spirit during baptism, to Jesus on Christmas in celebration of his birth, or even to Mary, Mother of Jesus during the Immaculate Conception festivity. Although Christians claim they worship only One God, in reality, they are actually worshiping many gods- both immortals and mortals alike.

In Islam, Allah is an Arab name for God, specifically, a desert moon deity brought forth into monotheism by Muhammad, a Muslim messiah. He is also considered as the son of god.

** Leviticus 24:13-16 - If you deny one of the gods or immortals you are committing blasphemy and blasphemers are stoned to death….. Matthew 12:31-32 - if you deny the Holy Spirit, God will not forgive you ....EVER.

Here are the other messiahs that proclaimed themselves as the Son of God.

Originemological timeline of ancient messiahs:

   In 3000 BC, Horus was born. After a few more years, an ancient Egyptian religion was founded.
      2000 BC, Abraham was born. After a few more years, he founded Judaism
      1500 BC, Moses was born. After a few more years, he received the Ten Commandments.
        560 BC, Buddha was born. After a few more years, he founded Buddhism
         30 AD, Christ was crucified. After a few more years, through Constantinople, Catholicism was founded
       500 AD, Muhammad was born. After a few more years, he founded Islam





* This timeline, reveals that there are other gods and prophets who are adored and venerated by people from different cultures, religions, and beliefs. Take note also, Moses who was raised by the pharaohs learned the creation of the universe from his Egyptian religion. Eventually, the story was replicated in Genesis, the first book of the Hebrew bible called the Pentateuch.

How the idea of god was conceived:

If we follow the early migration of humans (see map), the concept of god most likely would come from one of these countries: Africa, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Turkey, Kuwait, and Iran. 

Then the ideas most likely traveled either to Rome and Greece in the west or India and China in the east. Since our intention is to find where the concept of god originated, the west and east countries will be eliminated, and our focus will only concentrate on the seven countries on the list.

According to history, Turkey and Egypt are two of the first coastal civilizations in the world. It also says that the oldest site of worship is in Turkey. The first coins are also from Turkey and the invention of writing is from Ur, Sumer (Iraq) which means “land of the civilized kings”. Sumer is highly the probable source where the concept of god originated.

Sumer existed around 5000 BC and Sumerians believed that the universe was created by divine beings. Nammu, the god of waters, created the earth (Ki) and the sky (An). Enki, the son of Nammu and An, created man. The heaven was for the immortals, while the underworld Kur, ruled by Nergal, the god of death, was for the mortals.

Other Sumerian gods include Enlil, the god of wind; Ninhursag, the goddess of earth; Nanna, the god of the moon; Utu, the god of the sun; and Inanna, the goddess of love and war.

After the invasion of the Elamites and Amorites, the Sumerians ceased to exist. One of the Amorites, Abraham left Ur, settled down in the land of Canaan, and founded Judaism, and eventually Christianity was born. This whole mythological story reveals that the religions of the Hebrews, Romans, Greeks, Egyptians, and the Far East all originated from the Sumerians.

But where did the Sumerians get the idea of God?

The idea of man-to-god, or of human being gifted with divine or supernatural powers, belongs basically way back to that earlier period of the Age of Magic. Through alchemy and magic, High Priests and Kings were thought to have miraculous powers that could make rainfall or bring the sun to shine; heal the sick and bring the dead back to life; foresee success and disaster in war, and do various miraculous spells through sacrifices, prayers, chants, and rituals, obtain their statuses of being incarnate deities. With kings and high priests viewed by their people as gods, Men became Gods.

But, if magic was the foundation of religion, what causes mankind to abandon magic instead of faith and practice religion instead?

It was the admission of human weakness and ignorance. Man, for the first time, recognized his inability to control the natural forces. Since the rain still falls, the sun still shines, and the moon still journeys across the night sky, man accepts that he has no power over nature. He thought these forces were from the divine beings superior to him. Eventually, the man succumbed to these mighty beings, humbly relying his dependence on their powers, asking mercy to furnish him with all life’s blessings. From these actions, he developed the virtue of faith in Nature. Through faith and the pursuit of divine truth, he created religion. He created his church. He created the Bible. He created God. 

Man created God!


" Man came first through evolution, God came second through man's imagination." 
~ Joey Lawsin
      



About the Author :

Joey Lawsin is the author behind the new school of thought "Originemology". He is a revisionist who wants to change the world by rewriting the textbooks with new concepts that debunk the old scientific, theological, and philosophical ideas of antiquity. He published a book in Physics, created a conscious machine known as Biotronics, and conceived the theory of "The Caveman in the Box". The article is an excerpt from his book "Man Created God".


Disclaimer: The articles on this site are intended for a balanced education. Since it is constantly edited, updated, and improved, therefore I recommend that you check back regularly for new items. If you want to use anything here for the purpose of scholarly discussion, please inform the author by email or cite the source as follows: A Journal of a Beautiful Mind, Joey Lawsin, 1988, USA.








...spring equinox...

Books that I have read to satisfy my curiosity on religion:

A comparative View of Religions - J. H. Scholten
Atheism Refuted -Thomas Paine
Atheism in Pagan Antiquity - A.B. Drachmann
An Atheist Manifesto - Joseph Lewis
A study of the Messiah - J.E. Talmage
A System of Logic - J.S. Mill
An Outline of Occult Science - Rudolf Steiner
Bible Myths and Parallels in Religion - T.W. Doane
Babylonian Legends of Creation - E.A. Budge
Common Sense -Thomas Paine
Criticism on The Origin of Species - T.H. Huxley
Christian Mysticism - W.R. Inge
Cosmic Consciousness - A.J. Tyndall
Creation by Laws - J.L. Lawsin
Dream Psychology - Sigmund Freud
Determinism or Freewill - Chapman Cohen
Evolution of Theology: an anthropological study -T.H. Huxley
Evolution: Old and New - Samuel Butler
Evolution of Creation - J.L. Lawsin
Exposition of Darwinism - A.R. Wallace
Einstein Theory of Relativity - H.A. Lorentz
Elementary Theosophy - L.W. Rogers
Esoteric Christianity - A.W. Beasant
Feeding the Mind - Lewsi Carroll
Five of Maxwells's Papers - J.C. Maxwell
Forbidden books of the original New Testament - William Wake
Heretics - G.K. Chesterton
Heretics and Heresies - R.G. Ingersoll
History of the Catholic Church - James MacCaffrey
History of Ancient Civilization - Charles Seignobos
History's Conflict bet. Religion and Science - J.W. Draper
Intro to the History of Religions - C.H. Toy
Jewish Theology - Kaufmann Kohler
Judaism - Israel Abrahams
Logic, Inductive and Deductive - William Minto
Lamarck, The Founder of Evolution - A.S. Packard
Mystic Christianity - W.W. Atkinson
Mistakes of Moses - R.G. Ingersoll
Mysticism and Logic - Bertrand Russell
Myths and Legends of Rome - E.M. Berens
Mutation - Hugo de Vries
Nature Mysticism - J.E.Mercer
Natural Selection - Charles Darwin
On the Origin of Species - Charles Darwin
Originemology - J.L. Lawsin
Pagan and Christian Creeds - Edward Carpenter
Pagan and Christian Rome - R.A. Lanciani
Symbolic Logic - Lewis Carroll
Sidelights on Relativity - Albert Einstein
Philosophy of the Mind - G.W.F. Hegel
Story of Creation: comparison study - T.S. Ackland
The Antichrist - F.W. Nietzsche
The Holy Bible - R.G. Ingersoll
The Freethinker's text book - A.W. Besant
The Expositor's Bible - T.C. Edwards
The Limits of Atheism - G.J.Holyoake
The Ancient History - Charles Rollin
The Sayings of Confucius - Confucius
The Game of Logic - Lewis Carroll
The Gnostic Crucifixion - G.R.S. Mead
The Critique of Practical/Pure Reason - Immanuel Kant
The Origin of Jewish Prayers - Tzvee Zahavy
The Analysis of Mind - Bertrand Russell
The Problem of Philosophy - Bertrand Russell
The Brain - Alexander Blade
The Higher Powers of the Mind - R.W. Trine
The Human Aura - W.W. Atkinson
The Legends of the Jews - Louis Ginzberg
Thought Forms - C.W. Leadbeater
The Wonders in Psychology - J.H. Fabre

Translate Me ...



Search This Blog ...

In California,USA ...