by Joey Lawsin
This new school of thought was conceptualized mainly to determine the Genesis of Information - the origin, creation, and evolution of early primordial, ancient, and modern information based on the following basic scientific questions:
1. How did information emerge into the early minds of the very first humans?
2. Who supplied our primitive ancestors with information?
3. Where did it originate? Where did it come from?
4. Was the source of information a who or a what? Was it god, space aliens, or something else?
5. How does information transform into inscription and instruction?
Its integral component is threefold: first, it examines the origins of ideas, labels, or concepts made up by man like languages, numbers, behaviors, emotions, gods, and tools; second, it investigates the origins of objects created by nature like the universe, elements, plants, and animals; and third, it explores all the inherent laws of nature to synthesize the Single Theory of Everything.
In a broader sense, Originemology is a cross-interdisciplinary body of thoughts based on prevailing comparative research found in many subfields of study such areas as anthropology, archaeology, geography, history, chronology, etymology, ideology, onomatology, ontology, and epistemology. The main goal of the collaboration is to systematically trace backward the primal source or origin of information or idea - either abstract or physical, from being a single elemental entity to an emerging complex structure - with evidence-based findings and guided by these 5 primary questions:
1. How did the original idea emerge?
2. Who provided the original idea?
3. Where was the idea first conceptualized
4. When was the idea first conceptualized?
5. Why was the idea conceptualized in the first place?
The five cardinal collaborating principles that lay the foundations of Originemology constitute the following signature theories:
(i) The Caveman in the Box Trilogy,
(ii) Codexation Dilemma,
(iii) Intuitive Objects,
(iv) Inscription by Design
(v) Generated Emergence
The new study is also instrumental in shedding new insights into the five major ancient questions:
a. Who or what created the universe?
b. How all creation is created?
c. Where did we come from?
d. Why are we here?
Originemology is a novel and innovative approach to understanding the nature and origin of life, intelligence, and consciousness as well. By examining the inherent inscriptions in objects, both aneural and neural, originemology reveals the fundamental orders of being alive, living, and with life. Originemology also challenges the conventional views of cognition and behavior, and proposes a new paradigm of “A Brain without The Brain” that explains how aneural organisms can exhibit intelligence and consciousness.
Furthermore, Originemology also asserts that everything has a beginning - a source of origin. The beginning relatively both exists and doesn't exist. Everything starts from birth. Birth, the first inherent "genetic" code that gave everything its beginning, is the first instruction in the natural algorithm of creation. Everything ends as well. The end is called death. Death is the last instruction, genetic or otherwise, in the natural process of creation.
Originemology also claims that everything is a particle of information and every particle is an instruction. Instructional or information particles are called iParticles. They are called namons or names in human experiences. An iParticle can be a single concept, a collection of ideas, or a piece of information that is acquired, copied, utilized, and passed on from one atom to another atom, from one memory cell to another memory cell, from one substance to another substance, from one species to another species, from one culture to another culture, or from one generation to another generation. iParticle is a cultural hereditary LINK (lawsinic instructional konstant) that connects everything and everyone. It is the missing fiber that webs the tree of life.
The Theory of Originemology, although experimentally extrapolated from the Caveman-in-the-Box Trilogy and the Bowlingual Paradigm, was originally conceptualized and mathematically formulated based on the creation and evolution of the isodimensional morphical figures known as IDMF. Using a computer program and an actual structural model, the conclusive outcome of the IDMF configuration was discovered to be a Helixical Torus Dimetrix. In layman's terms, the final shape was a donut. With one rule and one type of object, the complex creation and evolution of the IDMF were made.
Originemology also claims that everything is a particle of information and every particle is an instruction. Instructional or information particles are called iParticles. They are called namons or names in human experiences. An iParticle can be a single concept, a collection of ideas, or a piece of information that is acquired, copied, utilized, and passed on from one atom to another atom, from one memory cell to another memory cell, from one substance to another substance, from one species to another species, from one culture to another culture, or from one generation to another generation. iParticle is a cultural hereditary LINK (lawsinic instructional konstant) that connects everything and everyone. It is the missing fiber that webs the tree of life.
The Theory of Originemology, although experimentally extrapolated from the Caveman-in-the-Box Trilogy and the Bowlingual Paradigm, was originally conceptualized and mathematically formulated based on the creation and evolution of the isodimensional morphical figures known as IDMF. Using a computer program and an actual structural model, the conclusive outcome of the IDMF configuration was discovered to be a Helixical Torus Dimetrix. In layman's terms, the final shape was a donut. With one rule and one type of object, the complex creation and evolution of the IDMF were made.
 |
ISBN: 978-1-4357-9408-5 |
 |
ISBN: 978-1-3879-8897-6 |
I will highlight a few of the fascinating points of the research covered in the book Originemology:
Part 1. The Experimental Study on AI with Family Dogs
Part 2. The Codexation Dilemma.
Part 3. The Analysis of the Origin of the Number System.
Part 1. The Case on the Acquisition of Information:
Objective:
How is information generated and acquired by animals, in particular by Canis Familiaris?
Specimen:
1. A giant malamute (control)
2. A mini chihuahua (experimental)
Methods:
1. A newborn husky is restrained from acquiring information from his environment.
2. The research environment is controlled and restricted from people, animals, and objects.
3. The emergence of information is strictly introduced by associative learning and discovery.
4. The experimental subject is presented to another breed after a couple of years.
5. The transfer of information to the experimental subject is documented.
Data:
1. Voice recognition through waveform signature generated by an oscilloscope.
2. Transfer of information from the control subjects to the experimental.
3. List of information (eg. words, actions) acquired by association and by discovery.
Conclusion:
1. Information is acquired only in two and only two ways: by choice and by chance.
2. Information is acquired from one's own environment.
3. The mind of a newborn is completely empty of information.
4. Nature is the Mother of Information and Energy is Nature's language.
5. New Principles and Paradigms originally discovered in Originemology and its Signature Theories.
Part 2. The Codexation Dilemma:
- Please see the partial paper here
Part 3. The Creation and Evolution of the Number System:
When I was a kid, I was deeply fascinated with numbers at a very early age I learned to count from 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 by heart. Then, the next 10 numbers ....10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20. And, the next group of ten numbers.....21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 .... and so forth and so on until I learned to recite each number from 1 to 100 with confidence.
However, visualizing and mastering these groups of numbers was far from easy. Well, one thing was for sure, I was not good at memorization. So I figured out a simple way of remembering these numbers. As I was writing all the numbers from 1 to 100 on a piece of paper, in groups of ten, I realized that the first ten numbers .... 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 .... were being used over and over again entirely on the list. This was the AHA moment. The set of ten counting numbers was the secret pattern that created the whole numerical system. It was the "genetic code" of the numeral kingdom so to speak. The "seed' in the life of the base-ten numbers.
Examination:
To show how these numbers generate ad infinitum, let us use the table matrix as shown below. In the top row, the numbers – 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 - are individually listed in each box. These ten basic digits serve as the seed or base. In the first column, meanwhile, the numbers listed downward are simply a guidepost or reference point. The rule of creating the numbers is simple: every number in this column will be paired with each number in the top row.
Replication:
So to produce the next 10 new numbers, the 10 numbers in the top row will be replicated on the second row. Then, from the first column, the number 1 will be paired side by side with the number 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9. Once done, the result in the second row will now look like this: 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19. From the 10 counting numbers that started from 0 to 9, the set is now transformed into 10, 11, 12 ... to 19.
If the same basic set of ten numbers ... 0123456789 ... is paired now with number 2, the next new group of numbers becomes 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29. Thus, after counting from 0 to 19, the numbers 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29 come next.
As the same rule is repeated and the same numbers are used over and over again, the next group in the fourth row becomes ...30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39. In the fifth row, the next group is 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49. In the sixth row, the next group is 50, 1, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, and so forth, and so on.
Propagation:
Therefore to create and generate new numbers and new groups, two things are needed: a set of rules and a set of numbers. From the same set of rules, numbers even evolve, propagate, and branch out into new entities and new families. They even propagate into new systems totally different from their original root or family as you will see later.
Interpretation:
Now, if instead of using 10 numbers, we use 2, 6, 8, and 16 numbers as the base of our counting system and use the same set of rules, will new numbers be created and generated as well?
Let us examine the Martian Number System. If Martians have six fingers, 3 on the right and 3 on the left, then their numerical system is made up of six numbers - 0,1,2,3,4,5. This assumption is based parallel to humans' 10 fingers that represent their 10 basic numbers. If we follow the same procedure of the base-10 system of generating numbers, the Martians matrix table will be:
From the table above, the Martian's counting system starts from 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5. However, instead of the numbers 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 following them, the numbers 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 come next after 5. Instead of 16, 17, 18 and 19, the numbers 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 come next after 15. Instead of 26, 27, 28, and 29, the numbers 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 follow next after 25. As the same set of rules is implemented over and over again, the Martian number system evolves and propagates forever in time just like Earthling's base-10 system.
Other interesting counting systems that yield numbers infinitely are the Binary and the Maya number systems. The Binary system utilizes only two numbers, 0 and 1, instead of six or ten numbers. With these 2 numbers, it can also generate (aside from numbers) new breeds of complex families like picture elements (pixels), computer programs (software), and smart robots (hardware) to name a few. The Maya number system, on the other hand, in essence, is a binary system with a twist. It comes also with two numbers in the form of solid objects - a stone(dot) and a stick(dash). The Stone represents a dot which is equivalent to One and the Stick a dash and equal to Five. With the number Zero, it is represented by a Shell. Although sticks, rocks, shells, leaves, and fingers were originally used for counting by our ancient ancestors, these pieces eventually evolved over time into various new systems like the smoke signals, the Morse code, and the complex worldwide web with rules.
Other numerical systems, invented by the Inca civilization, the Ancient Egyptians, the Mayans, the Greeks, the Babylonians, the Sumerians, and the Chinese, also evolved and propagated by following a set of rules. With an algorithm that guided their creations and evolutions, new entities and new families also existed. From all these systems, the set of instructions is the "creator" of the numerical world. A set of instructions is commonly known as the procedure. When rules or procedure is generally applied repeatedly to different conditions with the same outcome, it becomes a Law. The creation and evolution of the number system existed because of the Law. [Lawsin, 2000, Creation by Law]
When I reached my teenage years, my fascination with numbers snowballed and skyrocketed to the next level. Equipped with my father’s geometry book, I learned to extrapolate postulates, axioms, theorems, corollaries, propositions, and algorithms. With all this knowledge, I discovered patterns in the origin, creation, and evolution of things like how a dot transforms into a line, then into a triangle, into a circular form, and into other dimensional figures using a set of rules. I even explored how equations were derived, formulated, and transformed into other equations, to the point I uncovered the formula for the Grand Unified Theory which was actually Newton's F=ma, the root formula from where most equations in physics originated. Even mathematical equations like pi are common laws of Nature. My infatuation with patterns and numbers even led me to formulate my own Pythagorean equation. With all of these interesting mental exercises, what caught my attention most was the fact that all the information in geometry was based on the geometrical shapes nature has already designed. The Universe is made up of shape and space. Shape and space are the building blocks that create everything and everyone. They are the root of everything. Everything started with the dualpairing of Shape and Space. (The comprehensive discussion of the theory of Space and Shape is in the book Originemology).
Part 1. The Experimental Study on AI with Family Dogs
Part 2. The Codexation Dilemma.
Part 3. The Analysis of the Origin of the Number System.
Part 1. The Case on the Acquisition of Information:
Objective:
How is information generated and acquired by animals, in particular by Canis Familiaris?
Specimen:
1. A giant malamute (control)
2. A mini chihuahua (experimental)
Methods:
1. A newborn husky is restrained from acquiring information from his environment.
2. The research environment is controlled and restricted from people, animals, and objects.
3. The emergence of information is strictly introduced by associative learning and discovery.
4. The experimental subject is presented to another breed after a couple of years.
5. The transfer of information to the experimental subject is documented.
Data:
1. Voice recognition through waveform signature generated by an oscilloscope.
2. Transfer of information from the control subjects to the experimental.
3. List of information (eg. words, actions) acquired by association and by discovery.
Conclusion:
1. Information is acquired only in two and only two ways: by choice and by chance.
2. Information is acquired from one's own environment.
3. The mind of a newborn is completely empty of information.
4. Nature is the Mother of Information and Energy is Nature's language.
5. New Principles and Paradigms originally discovered in Originemology and its Signature Theories.
Part 2. The Codexation Dilemma:
- Please see the partial paper here
Part 3. The Creation and Evolution of the Number System:
When I was a kid, I was deeply fascinated with numbers at a very early age I learned to count from 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 by heart. Then, the next 10 numbers ....10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20. And, the next group of ten numbers.....21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 .... and so forth and so on until I learned to recite each number from 1 to 100 with confidence.
However, visualizing and mastering these groups of numbers was far from easy. Well, one thing was for sure, I was not good at memorization. So I figured out a simple way of remembering these numbers. As I was writing all the numbers from 1 to 100 on a piece of paper, in groups of ten, I realized that the first ten numbers .... 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 .... were being used over and over again entirely on the list. This was the AHA moment. The set of ten counting numbers was the secret pattern that created the whole numerical system. It was the "genetic code" of the numeral kingdom so to speak. The "seed' in the life of the base-ten numbers.
Examination:
To show how these numbers generate ad infinitum, let us use the table matrix as shown below. In the top row, the numbers – 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 - are individually listed in each box. These ten basic digits serve as the seed or base. In the first column, meanwhile, the numbers listed downward are simply a guidepost or reference point. The rule of creating the numbers is simple: every number in this column will be paired with each number in the top row.
Replication:
So to produce the next 10 new numbers, the 10 numbers in the top row will be replicated on the second row. Then, from the first column, the number 1 will be paired side by side with the number 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9. Once done, the result in the second row will now look like this: 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19. From the 10 counting numbers that started from 0 to 9, the set is now transformed into 10, 11, 12 ... to 19.
If the same basic set of ten numbers ... 0123456789 ... is paired now with number 2, the next new group of numbers becomes 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29. Thus, after counting from 0 to 19, the numbers 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29 come next.
As the same rule is repeated and the same numbers are used over and over again, the next group in the fourth row becomes ...30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39. In the fifth row, the next group is 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49. In the sixth row, the next group is 50, 1, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, and so forth, and so on.
Propagation:
Therefore to create and generate new numbers and new groups, two things are needed: a set of rules and a set of numbers. From the same set of rules, numbers even evolve, propagate, and branch out into new entities and new families. They even propagate into new systems totally different from their original root or family as you will see later.
Interpretation:
Now, if instead of using 10 numbers, we use 2, 6, 8, and 16 numbers as the base of our counting system and use the same set of rules, will new numbers be created and generated as well?
Let us examine the Martian Number System. If Martians have six fingers, 3 on the right and 3 on the left, then their numerical system is made up of six numbers - 0,1,2,3,4,5. This assumption is based parallel to humans' 10 fingers that represent their 10 basic numbers. If we follow the same procedure of the base-10 system of generating numbers, the Martians matrix table will be:
From the table above, the Martian's counting system starts from 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5. However, instead of the numbers 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 following them, the numbers 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 come next after 5. Instead of 16, 17, 18 and 19, the numbers 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 come next after 15. Instead of 26, 27, 28, and 29, the numbers 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 follow next after 25. As the same set of rules is implemented over and over again, the Martian number system evolves and propagates forever in time just like Earthling's base-10 system.
Other interesting counting systems that yield numbers infinitely are the Binary and the Maya number systems. The Binary system utilizes only two numbers, 0 and 1, instead of six or ten numbers. With these 2 numbers, it can also generate (aside from numbers) new breeds of complex families like picture elements (pixels), computer programs (software), and smart robots (hardware) to name a few. The Maya number system, on the other hand, in essence, is a binary system with a twist. It comes also with two numbers in the form of solid objects - a stone(dot) and a stick(dash). The Stone represents a dot which is equivalent to One and the Stick a dash and equal to Five. With the number Zero, it is represented by a Shell. Although sticks, rocks, shells, leaves, and fingers were originally used for counting by our ancient ancestors, these pieces eventually evolved over time into various new systems like the smoke signals, the Morse code, and the complex worldwide web with rules.
Other numerical systems, invented by the Inca civilization, the Ancient Egyptians, the Mayans, the Greeks, the Babylonians, the Sumerians, and the Chinese, also evolved and propagated by following a set of rules. With an algorithm that guided their creations and evolutions, new entities and new families also existed. From all these systems, the set of instructions is the "creator" of the numerical world. A set of instructions is commonly known as the procedure. When rules or procedure is generally applied repeatedly to different conditions with the same outcome, it becomes a Law. The creation and evolution of the number system existed because of the Law. [Lawsin, 2000, Creation by Law]
 |
| Mayan Counting System |
*Inscriptionist - sometimes called Lawsinist, is an individual with a passion in seeking or hunting the natural laws of the universe. Inscriptionists are inspired to uncover the beauty and elegance of formulas, equations, and natural laws in every nook and cranny of the universe to unearth the central dogma of life known as the Single Theory of Everything. Inscriptionism is its philosophical doctrine.
~ joey lawsin
Disclaimer: This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited as follows: Originemology, Joey Lawsin, 1988, USA.
