by Joey Lawsin
Does God has a beginning?
According to the Originemological Argument, "Everything has a beginning. The first beginning was there and was not there."
Joey Lawsin, who authored this paradoxical argument, claims that the initial beginning emerges from something and nothing. The beginning was caused by both something and nothing, a space and a shape. These something and nothing subsequently evolve as inherent embedded inscriptions and intuitive materials on both physicals and abstracts.
Thus, if God has a beginning, He emerges from both something and nothing.
The basic form of the argument is as follows:
1. Everything has a beginning.
2. The beginning emerges from both something and nothing.
3. Therefore, God emerges from both something and nothing.
A modified structure of the argument is:
1. Everything exists because other things cause it to exist.
2. God exists.
3. Therefore, God exists because other things cause Him to exist.
This proposition is grounded in three core principles of originemology: the Inlearning Konstant, the Codexation Dilemma, and the First Law of Originemology (Lawsin, 1988).
1. The Think Paradigm
2. The Single Theory of Everything
3. The Codexation Dilemma
By Choice means information is obtained from parents, teachers, books, schools, friends, lessons from animals, or from nature. By Chance means information is acquired from discovering new things, fortunate accidents, unexpected experiences, unknown events, and nature's interventions.
Regardless of the method, all information ultimately are acquired or borrowed originally from one's environment, from ones surrounding, from nature. Information originates from Mother Nature. Humans, animals, plants, and all things in the environment are individual pieces of information. Even their actions, forms, movements, and features constitute pieces of information that can be inlearned, imitated, or acquired by other humans, animals, and plants.
Nature is the original source that supply information. Every piece of information, whether acquired by choice or chance, can be traced back to the natural world. Nature is the ultimate repository of information —the Mother of all Information. The acquisition of information by chance or by choice is referred to as Inlearning.
The abstract concept of gods can be traced back to early human interactions with nature. The genesis of this idea began with the first primeval human, who, like newborns, started with no pre-existing knowledge. Through curiosity, he began to explore his environment and gained information by choice or by chance. Using his senses, he acquired new pieces of information and expanded his horizons
Observing animal behavior, he mimicked these actions. He learned to kill like animals hunt their prey. He became dominant among animals. However, when confronted with the formidable forces of nature—such as lightning, thunder, rain, and the sun—he perceived these phenomena as manifestations of entities more powerful than him. This led to the belief in powerful beings controlling these natural events.
Over time, the idea of god evolved. God was conceptualized, worshiped, and their stories were passed down through generations. They were documented in texts, embraced by various cultures, and personified globally. God was born. He gave birth to god. He codexated God. He made god. Man created God.
2. The second principle, known as The Codexation Dilemma, asserts that a person can't think of something without associating it with a physical object. This principle underscores the interconnectedness of Humans' ideas and Nature's objects. The idea of an apple is real because it can be physically associated with an object that can be touched, seen, or tasted. The idea of a bird is real because it can be physically sensed when it flies playfully in the sky or chirps a beautiful song while sitting on a branch of a tree. The ideas of air, sound, temperature, and other invisible parameters are real because they can be detected by scientific instruments and can even be calculated using mathematical equations. Aside from association and detection, trees, birds, apples, flowers, thunder, air, and the universe have their own individual unique material of identification.
God doesn't exist because his abstractness can't be associated with any objective reality, measured physically or even detected by precision instruments. God could not be associated with any objects because God himself has no personal unique physical identity. A thunder could not be a god because a thunder can be detected and has its own unique physical identity - a thunder. A flower could not be god, because a flower can be sensed and has its own unique material identity - a flower. The universe could not be god, because the universe can be both sensed, detected, and identified with its own unique physical concrete materials. Nature is nature. God could not be associated with any solid material because every physical object has already been identified individually with its own physical tangible uniqueness. If God is an idea that can't be transformed into physical reality and no material evidence can prove his existence physically, then God is not real. He is nothing but a mere notion... a concept ... a belief that resides only in the world of imagination. God is just an idea. Furthermore, if God is the only being before everything else, where did he get his ideas as proposed in the theory of the Caveman-in-the-Box Trilogy. How did he know the figures circle, square, triangle, and all other geometrical figures? How did he determine that the planets should be round, that the Milky Way should be spiral, and that animals should be cylindrical? Where did he learn all these shapes? Did he live previously in a material world much like Earth? The theory that asserts the inability of abstract ideas to transform into physical realities without the material world is called the Codexation Dilemma.
3. The third principle is known as The First Law of Originemology. It posits that "Every beginning arises from both something and nothing." It is a natural law – a universal law that is experienced from the time of birth by everything and everyone including God (if he exists).
Thus, if God is the beginning, he must evolve first from simple to complex. Seeds turn into trees, cells into humans, celestial elements into galaxies, and back to their "atomic" origins. If he has magical powers and created himself, then particle materials and building instructions must both exist first before he can create himself. Something has to come first - it's either god, materials, or instructions. If he popped out from nothing, then he contradicts the Single Theory of Everything.
Also, no one can create something material without some materials at hand. This is The Zizo Effect (what zips in must zips out). Furthermore, no one can create anything without anything at hand. So to create god, something or maybe nothing or both must come first before him. If God has a beginning, then God has a source of origin, even a birthdate, a birthplace, or a family?
But if God has no beginning and no end and infinitely existed, then it defies the Law of Originemology, the Law of Exponential Growth and Logarithmic Decay, and the Zizo Effect. Either his Existance is true or the Laws are false or vice versa. But the Laws provides true concrete evidence while his Existance provides no evidence at all. Where is God? If God is nowhere to be found, therefore, God doesn't exist. The discipline that studies the roots or source of origin of everything and everyone is called Originemology
Thus, the notion of God is an enduringly imaginary construct. Despite its persistence in human discourse, no empirical evidence or concrete object beyond the confines of the mind substantiates God’s abstract nature. This presents a Codexation Dilemma: God defies association with anything in the natural world. The inherent physical identities and properties of natural phenomena clash with the divine persona and supernatural attributes attributed to God. It is an Identity Crisis—a tension between the conceptual and the corporeal.
If we trace the original idea of God back to its roots, we find that it emerged from our interactions with nature. Early humans, devoid of pre-existing knowledge, explored their environment. Curiosity led them to acquire information through sensory perception. They observed animal behavior, mimicked actions, and learned survival strategies. Yet, encounters with natural forces—lightning, thunder, rain—hinted at something beyond the tangible. Thus, the abstract concept of gods was born.
However, this divine abstraction remains confined to the mind. God exists as a mental impression, a concept, a notion—forever elusive in the realm of codexation. Without unique identification through association, detection, and tangible representation, God remains intangible.
In conclusion, abstract ideas attain legitimacy when they are linked to tangible objects, thereby manifesting as physical reality. This concept is encapsulated in what is known as the Dualpairing of Reality; the Law of Codexation. The idea of god remains an imaginary idea even today as we speak because no physical object or solid evidence outside the mind can transform god's abstractness into physical reality; A Codexation Dilemma. God could not even be associated with anything in nature, since all things in nature have their own physical identities and properties that conflict with the divine persona and supernatural attributes of God; An Identity Crisis. If the original idea of god was borrowed from nature, created by man, and can't be represented by any physical object, then God exists only in the mind. He is a mental impression ... a concept ... a notion .... that will never ever be codexated. If God can't be uniquely identified by association, detection, and codexation, lo and behold, God doesn't exist.
A side note: While ideas originate from humans, their abstraction becomes tangible when linked to material objects. Consider gravity—an invisible force, yet detectable through instruments and mathematical equations. Love, too, is abstract, yet its sensation arises when two consenting individuals share a magical connection. Democracy, an abstract concept, finds physical representation in the collective mass of people constituting a government and the laws they enact. In contrast, God, despite being symbolically represented by devoted communities and divine laws, eludes physical detection. God will always remain an abstract idea because Man created God.
Note: The Illusion of Reality and the Lawsinium Fallacy are the other two assertions offered by the author that prove God doesn't exist. A thorough discussion of these topics can be found in the book Originemology.
" The First Law of Originemology states that
"Everything has a beginning. It emerges from both something and nothing.”
~ Joey Lawsin
About the Author :
Joey Lawsin is the author behind the new school of thought "Originemology". He is a revisionist who wants to change the world by rewriting the textbooks with new concepts that debunk the old scientific, theological, and philosophical ideas of antiquity. He published a book in Physics, created a conscious machine known as Biotronics, and formulated the assertion on "The Originemological Argument". The article above is an excerpt from his book "The Bible Proves God Does not Exist".
 |
Disclaimer: This article is intellectual property. The author retains the copyright to most of the research materials on this site unless cited otherwise. Some of the articles are edited on a day-to-day basis without notice and incorrect spelling, punctuation, and grammar can be found in any of the documents. If you are interested in using any of these works for the purpose of scholarly discussion or study, please first inform the author by email or cite the author's name or source as follows: A Journal of a Creative Mind, Joey Lawsin, 1988, USA.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No comments:
Post a Comment