Did the Universe begin with a Big Bang? Why scientists are wrong?
This article challenges the widely accepted scientific theory of the Big Bang as the origin of the Universe. It presents an alternative perspective based on Lawsin’s theory of Generated Interim Emergence, which posits that such events only occur when at least two things exist: a material and a by-material.
Introduction:
The Big Bang theory, first proposed by Georges Lemaitre in 1931, suggests that the Universe began with the explosion of a primeval particle. However, this paper argues that if everything started from a single particle, then this particle must be composed of other internal and external parameters that existed prior to the particle itself.
Lawsin’s Theory of Interim Emergence:
According to Lawsin, the cosmic event will only happen if at least two things are in existence, the material, and the by-material. A good example of a material is stone. When two stones are rubbed together, they produce friction. Friction is the by-product or by-material of the material. Likewise, gravity, pressure, temperature, ideas, emotions, and consciousness are by-materials because they are by-products of objects that are made up of material stuff. Both material and by-material are called Physicals.
The Concept of Abstracts:
In contrast to Physicals, non-physical things are termed Abstracts. They are not materials or by-materials. Examples of Abstracts include the natural equation such as the diameter of a circle that is always twice its radius or the structural inscription embedded in an object.
Critical Evaluation of the Big Bang Theory
If Lawsin’s theory holds true, two critical issues must be considered by the Big bang Theory:
- If the Universe began from an extremely dense and hot state, it implies that the Universe is a material universe. But where did these materials originate?
- If the Universe began from a primordial particle, how did it become dense and extremely hot without the assistance of other external sources?
Narrative:
Based on Giovanni Coriolis's formula W = F x d, to create FORCE there must be two parameters that are present: WORK(w) and DISTANCE(d).
Since every particle always has a mass, henceforth, according to Newton and Coriolis, it can only be created if four or five parameters are present, namely: Force, Work, Distance, Acceleration, and the stuff (or, MAYBE NOT AFTER ALL!) that makes the particle.
However, according to Albert Einstein E = mc², which is originemologically derived from Newton and Coriolis equations, Mass(m) is equivalent to Energy(e) and Velocity(c).
Analyzing the derivation of E = mc² based on F=ma and W=Fd:
W = F x D >>Eq1 – Coriolis equation
F = (M x A) >>Eq2 – Newton’s equation
W = (M x A) x D >>replace F from eq1 with eq2
W = (kg x m/s²) x m >>substitute dimensions w/units
W = (kg x m x m) / s² >>apply laws of exponents
W = ( kg x m² ) / s² >>( X)^A x (X)^B = (X)^A+B
W = kg x (m²/s²) >>combining
W = kg x (m/s)² >>simplifying
W = M x V². >>substitute Kg for M, m/s for V
W = m x c². >>c = velocity of light, m=mass
E = m x c² >>since Work(W) = Energy(E)
We can, therefore, conclude that a single particle can only be created if and only if the following basic parameters are present, namely:
- Force
- Acceleration
- Velocity
- Time
- Weight
- Gravity
- Energy
- Distance
- Work
On the other hand, following the train of thought above, it is obvious that some parameters, aside from density and temperature, are also needed to create an extremely dense and hot point of space.
The Density(p) of a particle can be calculated by its Mass(m) and Volume(v), while, the temperature of an object by its volume(V) and Pressure(P). However, from all these four given essentials, more hidden parameters also exist.
The Density(p) of a particle can be calculated by its Mass(m) and Volume(v), while, the temperature of an object by its volume(V) and Pressure(P). However, from all these four given essentials, more hidden parameters also exist.
Conclusion:
This scholarly article presents a compelling argument against the Big Bang theory as the origin of the Universe. It proposes an alternative perspective based on Lawsin’s theory of interim emergence which suggest that to create a primordial particle, other factors called internal and external interims must coexist to give birth to this material particle. Without these parameters, the particle will not exist and the Big Bang will not take place.
Now, here is something to ponder. Which came first the particle or the parameters? Which of the various parameters mentioned in this article came very first at the beginning of time?
About the Author:
Joey Lawsin is the author behind Originemology. He is a revisionist who wants to rewrite the textbooks by introducing new concepts that debunk the old scientific, theological, and philosophical ideas of antiquity. He published and self-published many books in Science, Philosophy, and Technology; invented the conscious machine; and created "The Caveman in The Box Trilogy". The article above is an excerpt from his book "Creation by Law".
This scholarly article presents a compelling argument against the Big Bang theory as the origin of the Universe. It proposes an alternative perspective based on Lawsin’s theory of interim emergence which suggest that to create a primordial particle, other factors called internal and external interims must coexist to give birth to this material particle. Without these parameters, the particle will not exist and the Big Bang will not take place.
Now, here is something to ponder. Which came first the particle or the parameters? Which of the various parameters mentioned in this article came very first at the beginning of time?
About the Author:
 |
"Everything has a Beginning.
It was just the very beginning was there and wasn't there."
~ Joey Lawsin
