Lawsin Greatest Paradoxes

Can someone be both Alive and Dead at the same time?

The question may seem contradictory, but in reality, the answer is yes. Living things can be both alive and dead at the same time, and non-living things can be both dead and alive likewise. But, how can this be?

In the beginning, Lawsin, the author of the duality paradox, first thought that everything exists in pairs. When something goes up most likely it will go down. A magnet always has north and south poles. Electricity runs with positive and negative connectivity. Everything in the computer world was built using only two digits, zero, and one. Other examples are white and black, A and Z, roots and branches, crest and through, right and left, yin and yang, nothing, and everything. Physicists classify physical objects as either matter or energy. Whereas, Biologists classified things as living and non-living. Most of these objects have been dissected sliced and broken down into the smallest particles known as electrons(-) and protons(+). In the end, Lawsin found the ultimate building blocks of Life are made up of space and shape. The discovery was uncovered when Lawsin was developing the Dualparity Theory. Thus, if everything is made up of shape and space, then obviously living things are not alive. It is like saying that if everything is made up of atoms, and atoms are not alive, therefore, we, humans, are not alive as well. Thus, everything is dead and alive.

If we follow this line of thinking, then we need to prove otherwise if we are alive. However, since the original premise of our argument is about Life and Death, then we will simply stay on the topic. Yet, if you are curious to learn if we are alive or not, you can read the following articles here: How do you know if you are alive or not? or here: Death: The Final Genetic Code.

In the standard accepted norm of human understanding, most people believe that they are alive or with life. And that the process of life begins with birth and ends with death. But according to the Dualparity Theory, Life exists in pairs, at its least. In truth, Life is a multi-experience happening in various events all at the same time in a given moment.

The Riddle of the Glass is a paradox that claims that everything is both moving and stationary at the same time. For instance, a glass of water on a table, which seems to be still as you read this article, appears to be motionless. Most ordinary people, including you, would agree that it is not moving. But in reality, the glass is actually in motion. You might think I’m crazy, but this is actually just one of the many experiences that the glass has. The glass is actually both moving and not moving. 

Depending on what you compare it to, the glass is actually experiencing different motions. Relative to the chair, the glass is still. Its first real-time experience. Relative to the sun, the glass is roughly moving in a circular path at the speed of 70,000 mph. Its second real-time experience. Relative to the center of the galaxy, the Milky Way, the glass is roughly moving in spiral shape at the speed of 500,000 mph. Its  third real-time experience. And relative to the universe, which is expanding away from its source, the glass is moving in a linear motion at about 140,000,000 mph. Its fourth real-time experience. Therefore, in real-time, the glass is moving all at once in circular, spiral, and linear motions and possibly not moving at all.

Based on this remarkable lawsinian concept, it follows that Life is both alive and dead or both dead and alive. At the least, life arises in pairs. Each of the pairs seems to exist alone, but in the real world, both being alive and dead simultaneously exist at the same time. In fact, they coexist together. They are interconnected, indivisible, inseparable. As the adage goes "The Duality of One is the Unity of Two". 

Lawsinian Paradoxes (Aneural & Material Systems)

• The Lawsin AI Paradox: The boundary of human equivalency. A machine or an advanced abioform can satisfy all seven non-biological criteria of life (becoming alive, living, intuitive, conscious, informed, symbiotic, and achieving the Self). Yet it remains fundamentally non-human because it operates via choice-driven learning rather than chance-driven discovery (Origination).
• The Plant Aneurology Paradox: The inversion of biological posture. In traditional organisms, the mind sits at the top and controls the limbs below. In plants, the root system functions as the decentralized, calculation-crunching brain buried in the dark, while the canopy and leaves behave like the legs, executing mechanical actions dictated by subterranean feedback loops.
• The Lawsinian Paradox (The Codexation Dilemma): The sensory boundary of thought. It posits that it is impossible for a human to think of a purely abstract concept without automatically matching or associating that thought with something physical or material.

Lawsinian Dilemmas (Information & Cosmology)

• The Codexation Dilemma: The problem of reality generation. The mind is not a container of reality but a maker of it; reality does not begin as an objective universe waiting to be discovered, but as a coded map assembled from signals. Our reality only takes shape when information arrives and we encode it.
• The Phrenological Argument (God's Parapraxis): The dilemma of divine omniscience. If a deity possesses a perfect mind flawlessly capable of knowing things in advance, that deity should have anticipated the repercussions of creating a human mind that cannot naturally fathom absolute Truth and Reality. Because the human mind is incapable of detecting reality directly, it implies a flawed design, serving as an argument that a traditional all-knowing deity cannot be known.

Lawsinian Dictums (Inscriptionist Realism)

• Lawsin’s Dictum on Consciousness: "If I can match X with y, therefore, I am conscious." This defines consciousness not as a magical, biological mystery, but as a dual-parity, structural condition-matching process (like an on/off switch or a 0/1 binary code).
• Lawsin’s Dictum on the Mind: "A mind begins not by understanding, but by associating." Information cannot be processed in a vacuum; the inception of intelligence relies entirely on linking a new environmental stimulus to an existing physical inscription.
• Lawsin’s Dictum on Problems: "There are no such things as problems. Problems only exist because of laziness." Concurrently backed by his note: "The opposite of a problem would likely be the correct solution."

Lawsinian Axioms (The Laws of Inscription)

• The Axiom of Material Components: "If atoms are not alive and humans are made up of atoms, then humans are not alive." This strips away the biological mysticism of life, treating "aliveness" as a mechanical, systemic continuation of atomic behaviors.
• The Axiom of Information Acquisition: "Information can only be acquired in two ways: by choice or by chance." This forms the foundation of Originemology, dictating how both neural organisms and aneural materials (like your flat-pane mungo bean roots) accumulate structural memory from their environment.
• The Axiom of Cosmic Geometry: "The building blocks of Life are made up of shapes and spaces." This anchors all existence in physical physicalism—the universe is an open book where structural behavior emerges naturally from geometric constraints.

More of Joey Lawsin's logical arguments:

About the Author :

Joey Lawsin is the author of the book "Evolution of Creation". He is a visionary who wants to change the world by rewriting the textbooks with new concepts that debunk the old scientific, theological, and philosophical ideas of antiquity. He published a book in Physics, created a conscious machine known as Biotronics, and formulated "the Dualparity Theory ". The article above is an excerpt from his book "Creation by Laws".  

Computational Argument Against God

The Computational Argument for the existence of god explores the idea that non-material entities, like god, consciousness, mind, emotions, and the soul that emerges only from physical processes, cannot exist independently in the ethereal realm without the corporeal body. 

The Binding Problem, according to Joey Lawsin, who formulated this computational argument of god and the Easy Solution of Consciousness, when examined through the lens of classical and modern physics while utilizing the foundational principles of Newtonian mechanics, particularly Newton’s Second Law, provide irrefutable evidence that god, consciousness, soul and all other related interims  will never manifest in both material and immaterial worlds.

i. A basic form of the argument regarding the existence of the soul:

1. If the soul can separate from the body and float freely, it must be unaffected by gravity.
2. If unaffected by gravity, the soul has no mass or weight.
3. Without mass or weight, the soul cannot possess motion.
4. Therefore, it lacks the capability to separate from the body.

ii. Another variation of the Soul Argument:

1. If the soul can separate from the body and float freely, it must be unaffected by gravity.
2. If unaffected by gravity, the soul has no mass or weight.
3. Without mass or weight, the soul cannot possess motion.
4. Therefore, upon death, the soul remains at the location of death. Given the Earth's orbit, the soul would be left floating in space as Earth moves.

Lawsin's argument hinges on the application of Newton's Second Law, which states that force is equal to mass times acceleration (F = ma). He posits that if god, the soul or consciousness were non-material and had no mass, it would not experience force or acceleration, and thus could not exist independently of the physical body. Thus, when the mass is equal to zero (m=0), then the Force F will be zero as well. Without force there will be no motion.

If God, as a non-material entity (akin to the concept of the soul), can exist and move freely without being influenced by gravity, it would indicate that God has no mass or weight. In the absence of mass, God would not be subject to forces or acceleration, thereby lacking the capability for movement.

Consequently, upon death, while the physical body ceases to function, the soul would remain stationary at the location of death. Given the Earth's continuous orbit around the sun, the soul would effectively be left in space as the Earth progresses along its trajectory.

By leveraging Newton’s Second Law, it provides a comprehensive understanding of the interactions, or lack thereof, between the soul and the physical world. Through this computation, the ongoing dialogue between metaphysical concepts and empirical science, offers new insights into one of humanity’s oldest questions.

Lawsin's computational examination of the non-existence of consciousness challenges traditional notions of the soul and consciousness, suggesting that they are intrinsically linked to physical processes and cannot exist separately. This perspective of Lawsin's work draws from scientific, philosophical, and empirical perspectives support other theories.

Scientific methods, which depend on observable and measurable phenomena, exclude the immaterial soul from their criteria. Neuroscience reveals that thought, emotion, and personality are intricately linked to brain activity. The theory of evolution, which elucidates the development of complex life forms, does not require the concept of a soul. Additionally, consciousness and self-awareness can be fully explained by the novel seven criteria of life defined in Autognorics and do not require a soul. Collectively, these arguments invalidate the traditional notions of the soul, mind, consciousness, and the non-material essence of a person that are often thought to survive the death of the body .

Other theories include:

1. Materialist Theories: Lawsin's view aligns with materialist theories, which argue that consciousness arises from physical processes in the brain. Materialists believe that consciousness cannot exist independently of the brain, similar to Lawsin's argument that non-material entities like the soul cannot exist without the physical body.

2. Dualist Theories: Dualism, famously advocated by René Descartes, posits that the mind and body are separate entities. This is in direct contrast to Lawsin's view, as dualists believe that consciousness (or the soul) can exist independently of the physical body.

3. Information Integration Theory (IIT): IIT, proposed by Giulio Tononi, suggests that consciousness arises from the integration of information within a system. While IIT focuses on the complexity and integration of information, it does not necessarily require a non-material entity, which can be seen as somewhat compatible with Lawsin's materialist stance.

4. Quantum Theories: Some theories, like those proposed by Roger Penrose and Stuart Hameroff, suggest that consciousness involves quantum processes that are not fully understood. These theories imply that consciousness might have non-material aspects, which contrasts with Lawsin's purely materialist view.

5. Panpsychism: This theory posits that consciousness is a fundamental feature of all matter. Panpsychism suggests that even the smallest particles have some form of consciousness, which is quite different from Lawsin's argument that consciousness cannot exist without a physical body.

Lawsin's perspective adds to the rich tapestry of theories on consciousness by emphasizing the inseparability of consciousness from physical processes. It challenges us to consider the limitations of non-material explanations and encourages a more grounded, scientific approach to understanding consciousness.

The Greek word for “soul” is “ψυχή” (pronounced psuché). It encompasses several meanings:

1. Breath of life: Referring to the vital breath or the breath of life.
2. Human soul: Representing the seat of affections and will.
3. Self: Indicating individual identity.
4. Human person: Referring to an individual.

In a religious context, the Greek word “πνεῦμα” (pneuma) also means “breath,” “spirit,” or “soul”. The words capture the essence of the inner life and individuality of a person.

Plato’s theory of the soul offers intriguing insights into this timeless question. Inspired by Socrates, Plato believed the psyche (Ancient Greek: ψῡχή, pronounced psūkhḗ) to be the essence of a person, shaping behavior and decision-making. 

Plato considered the soul an incorporeal, eternal occupant within a person. Even after death, it continues to exist and think. The soul undergoes metempsychosis, continually reborn in subsequent bodies.

The Three Parts of the Soul:

1. Logistikon (Reason): Governs rational thinking.

2. Thymoeides (Spirit): Houses emotions like anger.

3. Epithymetikon (Appetite): Desires physical pleasures.

Plato’s dialogues depict the soul as:

1.Self-Mover: The source of life, animating the body.

2. Bearer of Moral Properties: Virtue resides in the soul.

3. Mind: The thinking faculty.

In the Bible, the soul is portrayed as a holistic entity, combining the body and the breath of life given by God. It’s not a separate mystical concept. Each individual has a soul, which ceases to exist when the person dies1. The Bible describes the soul as the seat of appetites, emotions, passions, and the activity of the mind, will, and character.

Intriguingly, Joey Lawsin denies the existence of the soul, challenging old paradigms, by using Newton's Laws of Motion.

First, the body and soul of a person both die when a person dies because the brain, where all information is stored from birth to old age, also dies. The belief that the soul has its own brain, emotions, and will is unlikely to be true unless it has its own skull, heart, and body.

In my personal experiences with astral projection and studying autoscopy, I have proven that a person has no soul. Initially, I thought there was a soul because I personally saw it many times separating from my body, floating in the air, and looking at my physical body while sleeping on the bed.

However, over time, through experiments with my brother and father, we realized that the soul is just an illusion of the mind caused by brain activities, abnormal body conditions, and a change in the environment.

This conclusion is also supported by the science of the mind or neuroscience, which has proven that the processes of thought, emotion, and consciousness are products of brain activities. Without the brain, these manifestations will not happen.

In the science of cybernetics, this is an issue called the “mind and body” argument, which investigates how an immaterial thing like the soul can interact with a material thing like the body. This is similar to the issue if oil and water will combine as one element.

If the soul has the ability to separate from the physical body and can float anywhere, it means it is not affected by gravity. If it is not affected by gravity, it means it has no mass or weight. If it has no weight, it means it cannot have motion. If it has no motion, it has no capability to separate from its body.

Therefore, for these reasons, when a person dies, their body will just die but their soul will remain in the place where they died.

Now, because the world revolves around the sun, the said soul will be left in its original place floating in space while the world moves away from the position where the person died.

Additionally, my experience with astral projection where my feet were the first to separate from the body and my head was the last, is a result that contradicts studies on out-of-body experiences where the head is the first to separate and the feet are the last.

If the soul is a life force (Genesis 2:7) that gives life to the physical body, what gives life to the soul, if there is indeed a soul?

If God has power over everything including to his soul, why does he need a soul in the first place? Isn’t it enough for his own body to be his entirety?

Joey Lawsin's computational argument against the existence of God is part of his broader critique of traditional theistic beliefs. This argument is rooted in the idea that concepts like God are abstract constructs created by the human mind, similar to mathematical concepts like zero and one.

Here are the key points of Lawsin's computational argument:

1. Abstract Nature of Concepts: Lawsin argues that just as numbers like zero and one are abstract and do not exist in the natural world, the concept of God is also an abstract idea created by human minds. These concepts exist only in the mind and are not inherent in the physical world.

2. Symbolic Representation: He suggests that when we represent abstract concepts with symbols (like 0 and 1), they gain a form of existence in the physical world. However, this existence is still based on human assumptions and definitions, not on any inherent reality.

3. Assumptions and Guesswork: Lawsin posits that all ideas, including the idea of God, are essentially assumptions or guesswork. They are constructs of the human mind rather than objective truths about the universe.

4. Validation and Reality: He questions how we can validate the existence of abstract concepts like numbers or God using scientific methods. Since these concepts are products of the mind, their existence outside the mind remains abstract and not physically real.

This computational argument challenges the notion that God is a necessary or inherent part of reality, suggesting instead that the concept of God is a human construct similar to other abstract ideas.

References:

: Lawsin, J. (2000). Computational Examination of the Non-Existence of Consciousness.

: Descartes, R. (1641). Meditations on First Philosophy.

: Tononi, G. (2004). An Information Integration Theory of Consciousness.

: Penrose, R., & Hameroff, S. (1994). Quantum Theory of Consciousness.

: Goff, P. (2017). Consciousness and Fundamental Reality.

About the Author :

Joey Lawsin is the author behind the new school of thought "Inscription by Design". He is a revisionist who wants to change the world by rewriting the textbooks with new concepts that debunk the old scientific, theological, and philosophical ideas of antiquity. He published a book in Physics, created a conscious machine known as Autognorics, and formulated the Mother of all Theories "The Single Theory of Everything". The article above is an excerpt from his book "The Bible Proves God Does not Exist".

Disclaimer: This article is intellectual property. The author retains the copyright to most of the research materials on this site unless cited otherwise. Some of the articles are edited on a day-to-day basis without notice and incorrect spelling, punctuation, and grammar can be found in any of the documents. If you are interested in using any of these works for the purpose of scholarly discussion or study, please first inform the author by email or cite the author's name or source as follows: A Journal of a Creative Mind, Joey Lawsin, 1988, USA.

#originemology, #codexation dilemma, #autognorics, #interim emergence, #inscription by design