Creationists believe God created the universe. However, this belief is different in every culture. Every culture has each own god to worship. The God of India is totally different from the God of the Christian. The religious ceremonies of the jews are totally different from the Muslims. The teachings in Koran are way way different from the biblical tenets found in the Torah.
Evolutionists, on the other hand, believe in various forms of creationism. Aside from Darwinian evolution, here are some other theories on evolution:
1. Essentialism - the theory of forms
2. Teleology
3. Empedocles Theory - life originated by chance
4. Aristotle Principle - life was designed with a purpose
5. Epicurean System - natural selection from Gaia
6. Theistic Evolution
7. Orthogenesis
8. Saltationism
9. Neo-Lamarckism
10. Viegenesis - self-creation by systemic instruction and vitalic material
11. GOD Theory - the grand organism dispersion theory or the plentitude principle
12. Punctuated Equilibrium
13. Omega Point Theory
14. Gaia Hypothesis
15. Macro and microevolution
Based on the flowchart, for Evolution to work, there must be at least 3 basic elements or conditions that must be met:
1. There must be a pre-existing life-form.
2. Reproduction or Radiation must take place.
3. Mutation.
Science defines Mutation as a process where the genetic materials in a living cell have been either deleted, inserted, or substituted. For example. the letters JOEY is a healthy gene. If the letter Y is removed or deleted from the cell, the cell will undergo mutation. If the letter Y is inserted in a different place as in JOYE or replaced as in JOIE, the cell will also undergo mutation. However, all these changes can only be triggered in two and only two ways: by Radiation and by Reproduction (see flowchart). Natural selection as commonly supported by the scientific community can't produce mutation.
Natural selection is the idea that organisms can eventually change their physical appearances and behavioral traits as they adapt to their environment. The problem with this idea is the fact that no internal genetic change is happening in the process. The change is external. The long neck of a giraffe evolved because of the belief that over time it gradually stretched reaching for higher leaves is totally misrepresented. Without internal mutation, the evolution of the neck will not happen. Mutation is the only key material that matters in order for evolution to work.
Every organism self-creates itself as interacts with its environment. DNA itself follows the same rule. A sperm evolves differently from an egg cell because of the natural fact that the two belong to two different environments - the female and male bodies. Also, the information gained by these two organisms is limited and different since they exist in an environment totally different from one another. This is like saying space aliens are probably different from human beings due to the fact that the environment where they live is different from us. They might not have eyes or ears or even hands just like us. Even their intelligence is most likely different from us too.
Based on Originemology, the total evolutionary characters or attributes of a species are actually fully dependent on the place where it lives and learns things from its surrounding. Thus, the subtle physical differences among living things and non-living things are not because of the intervention of DNAs but due to how they react with their environment and acquire information from their surroundings.
The same line of thought also applies to cells and DNAs. How it this so?
A sperm is a cell. Its function is to carry its genetic information (23 chromosomes) into the egg cell which also carries 23 chromosomes. The 23 chromosomes from the male body must combine with the other 23 chromosomes from the female body to produce a human being.
Sperm is made up of three parts: the head, where the chromosomes are kept; the body, that serves as the engine in which the seminal fluid is its gasoline; and the tail, that serves as a propeller. If DNA contains the biological instructions that determine the development of the human's head, body, arms, and feet, where did the sperm get its instructions to form its own body parts in the first place?
How did these unconscious cells "automatically" know where to swim if they don't even have a single knowledge about the existence of the egg cell in the first place and the path where it is located? Are these cells conscious, alive, with nervous systems, brains that they are capable to navigate inside the womb intellectually? Or, are all of these events just mechanical chemically triggered by its internal environment as suggested by Originemology?
If a sperm is alive, what are the biological sensors it uses to sense the egg cell? Does it have a
nose capable of detecting chemical scent? Does it have eyes capable to see its way? Does it emit vibrations through the membrane or skin of the womb? Signal connection? Perceptors? Automatic? What gave birth to sperm cells? Do these cells carry their own instructions as well in the form of DNAs?
Could DNA be a hoax?
DNA or deoxyribonucleic acid is believed to be the blueprint of our body that stores that codes that will make us -- all our biological organs and physical features. However, DNA is a helixal chemical structure that is found in genes. The genes are found inside chromosomes which in turn located inside the nucleus of a cell which is again contained inside a molecule. In other words, DNA lives in a simple environment where the acquisition of information is absolutely limited. This is one of the reasons why DNAs cannot be the carrier of all genetic codes needed to form a particular organism or species. If all DNAs live in the same environment, its limited acquired information will not be that complex (law of boundaries).
DNA itself is made up of only four basic genetic codes -- A, G, C, and T -- which stands for adenine, guanine, cytosine, and thymine respectively. The combinations of these letters produce a vast amount of instructions that build the digestive, nervous, circulatory, skeletal, respiratory organs and other hereditary features of the physical body which seems impossible to be contained in about 100 thousand billion of microscopic spheres no larger than the period at the end of this sentence. In addition, if DNAs are like computer discs, genes as instructions, and bits as the four genetic codes, then these codes must be encoded and decoded in order to be interpreted and translated like how computer digital signals are transformed or codexated to physical letters, numbers, and pictures. If the instructional codes cannot be translated then they are meaningless (codexation dilemma) or these codes could be nothing but an illusion as explained in the lawsinic Software Illusion Conundrum. So, how are these instructional codes switched on, indexed, interpreted, translated, and compiled as a programmable prior-procedure? A messenger RNA probably? If this is the case, then DNA would be useless without RNA!
As I have shown, Darwinian evolution only works when, first, there is pre-existing life; second, reproduction takes place (e.g. chihuahua must have coitus with a giant malamute to produce new specie). and, third, there must be a mutation. If these three essentials elements are not present, Darwinian evolution will not work. And with regards to DNA, does it basic parts also come with built-in instructions or genetic codes? If so where did the chromosomes and other parts get their instructions? Remember, that information comes from the environment and DNA surrounding is too simple and limited. You be the judge!
Abiogenesis formula for making life:
Dirt + water + time = living things.
God Genesis formula for creating life:
Dirt + breath + magic = living things
And here is more. The word mutation, which was coined by Hugo DeVries in 1901, was obviously not in Darwin's books on Origin of Species (1859) and Descent of Man (1871). He did not have any idea yet about genetic mutation. He used the word variation instead.
Evolution is still a theory because there is no substantial evidence that it works. It is not a law or a universal principle because it cannot predict consistently the outcome or product of what it claims - a new different family of species. No one still knows what will be the outcome when a lizard mates a bird. Will it be a new same specie or an altered new different specie? Or is this really possible?
Irreducible complexity - a concept that darwin (1859) raised in the origin of species which has become a central tenet of creationism is "If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modification, my theory would absolutely break down" (Darwin 1859, p.189).
( .... not yet edited and to be continued .... )
A cell is an enclosure made up of the vitalic element just like the biosphere that is made up of the elements of life. It has a nucleus and other stuff that surround the nucleus. DNAs are found in the nucleus and some can also be found inside mitochondria. A nucleus is an enclosure and mitochondria is another enclosure. The theory of pericorpus tells us that all things are enclosed. There is a purpose why pericorpus exists.
DNAs are believed to store information. They are coded as AGCT. They also follow my concept of dualpairing where A dualpair with T and C with G. These are rungs in a bioladder where the sides are made up of sugar and phosphate. All three are called nucleotide and they are arranged in a spiral double helix, which supports again my third law in creation. However, microbiologists or geneticist maybe have not figured out that this helix is symmetrically structured inversely. And of course, there are several questions that run in my mind like, how does genetic information is being stored. Do DNAs have brains that they can store information? How do DNA writes codes of information using only four letters? Mathematically, AGCT can only produce 24 combinations of letters.
A gene, if I interpret it correctly, is a list of instruction that builds proteins. (this statement calls for a more, deeper discussion) And every person has two copies of genes (a dualpair) coming from each parent. (remember that these genes learned "information" just like the drowning kitten). But I just really do not know how these instructions are stored (what comes to my mind is chemical reactions probably?).
I do not know how chromosomes will get into the picture. But I know that chromosomes can divide into two sections called "arms". (another dualpairing?). And their total is 46 which is again divisible by two.
I could not even see how amino acids are directly interconnected with DNAs. But I know that proteins are made up of at least 20 different types of amino acids. However what I am interested in proteins are they function as messenger, carrier, transporter, which are the only main function of any materials or physicals in terms of the dualpairing relationship between force-energy and mass-wave.
What also caught my attention about genes is that they can be turned on and off called gene regulation. If this claim is right then it is true that instructions can be turned on and off. This is part of my research. Remember the switching force, which I called force-energy. It is this energy that switches on any instruction. However, gene regulation is not yet really fully understood by geneticists. With the isodimensional morphical figures version, these switches can be explained to a greater extent.
Mitosis and Meiosis also follow dualpairing and the law of symmetrical inversion (same as inverse square law with a twist).
" Every information has a source of origin. It can be conceptualized or materialized. It can be acquired by choice or by chance. Whatever the case, Nature is the mother of all information. "
~ Originemology
Disclaimer: The author retains the copyright on most of the research materials on this site unless cited otherwise. However, some of the articles are edited on a day to day basis without notice. If you are interested in using any of these works for the purpose of scholarly discussion or study, please cite the author's name or reference as follows: A Journal of a Creative Mind, Joey Lawsin, 1988, USA.
