20 Most Common Theories on the Origin of Life

First published Mar 1988; revised Oct 1909
by Joey Lawsin

The Origin of Life is defined in many ways depending on the scientist who is doing the research or the average person walking in the street. Biochemists claimed that the biological interactions of organic molecules make up life on earth. Ecologist studied the relationship between organisms and their environment, ethologists the behavior of animals and plants, embryologists the development of a single cell into a complex organism, evolutionary biologists the emergence of species from low life forms, taxonomists the relationships and forms of more than a million of species of plants and animals. Yet despite the enormous contributions of these various specialists, it is so remarkable that there is still no general definition of what Life is.

However, one key characteristic of life discovered in the study of originemology was the ability of an organism to codify, which is the ability to associate what it senses with what it senses. This behavior is known as Codexation. If an organism has a biological sensor with a capacity to sense, then such a life-form can match things. The skin is the largest organ that carries enormous sensors that are distributed all over its surface. If all organisms have skins, therefore, all plants and animals are alive, with life, and living. This definition also pertains to biotronics and zoikrons. (Lawsin1988)

It is known that humans are a collection of thousands of billions of cells. These cells are fundamentally similar to those of all animals and plants. Each cell type is made up of a nucleus, cytoplasm, and a substance called protoplasm. The fundamental mechanism of cells is a function of their nucleic acids and proteins. The nucleic acid is believed to carry genetic information or codes. Although all cells contain identical nucleic acids, some of them become specialized in forming bone cells, teeth cells, liver cells, blood cells, skin cells, or hair cells. But how these cells "know" what type of specialized cells they must become is still unknown. Since life cannot be explained solely by physics and chemistry, let us try smart geometry or the Dimetrix of Viegenesis.

- 1ROOT -

Viegenesis, or creation by dualpairing, is a theory that asserts all things are created - in general, by the dualpairity of systemic instructions and vitalic materials; and in particular, by the crosscodexation of *abstracts (nothing) and physicals (something) that originated from space and shape. The word comes from the Latin “genesis” which means “origin” (creation, birth), and “vie” which means “capable of life by way of two of a kind, coupled in use.” [Lawsin 1988].

This new theory proposes that the creation of the universe began when the primeval dualpair of space and shape, coupled together as one, gradually evolved, inscripting and emerging simultaneously, through the process of creation. This dualistic pair, the shape of something and the space of nothing, was parts of the whole where each part then become the whole. The presence of something, called physicals, was the material plane where physical objects evolved. The absence of nothing, called abstracts, was the immaterial plane where abstract objects have evolved. This dualpairing of physicals and abstracts that evolved into Instruction and Material, the building blocks of life, gave birth to the creation and evolution of everything and everyone.

In the beginning, there were only two entities that exist — space (abstracts) and shape (physicals). This homogenous space-shape entity eventually evolved into a heterogeneous substance of material named WavMon and the immaterial unit called Wylzan. This dualpairing of Wavmon and Wylzan sparked the Evolution of Creation and created a universe made up of two dimensions: the material world called primesclisian (meaning the first slice) and the immaterial world called nalwsclisian (meaning the alter slice).

Before the birth of this isodimensional (meaning equal planes) universe, at the very beginning of its motionless and static existence, this Dualpair at a certain point could have interacted together chemically, physically, or mechanically due to the varying compositions of its masses over its volumetric contents. This transformational event which I can speculate to be a moment of physical-chemical, cause-effect, action-reaction interactions. eventually created a gap and mechanically inscripted the very first lawsinic instruction: (to) Move. This gap in the fabric of location created the phenomenon of motion — the wavmon wiggles.

From this singular movement, various particles and parameters were born dramatically. One of these parameters was — empty space. When the wavmon moved, it created an empty space and a perimeter wall. As it drifted towards the gap and touched its circumferential wall,  the wavmon bounced back in the opposite direction as it spewed creating the phenomena of vibration. When it bounced away from the internal wall, the size of the wavmon became lesser than its original size. The small amount of size that was lost has been converted to waves that were spewed out externally all over outside the emptyspace forming wavelets. These waves' vibrations forced the wavmon again to drift towards the empty space wall and the cycle went on and on until its total size transformed completely into waves. Eventually, the mass-wave force-energy relationship created new parameters of particles and instructions. 

The Particle Evolution:

The mass wave was the material side of the wavmon. The force-energy was its by-material side. In the material world, the masswave was more dominant than the energyforce. While in the by-material world, the energyforce was more dominant than the masswave. From this two-dimensional structure categorized as the second wave of creation, the wavmon evolved, transformed, and regrouped to form a new kind of entity called elemental particles.

In the primesclisian world, Particles that are masswave are called monicles. They are physical objects called Matter. Particles that are energyforce are called wavicles. They are physical objects called By-Matter. Monicles and wavicles are the dualpair that created the Family of Particles. Monicles evolved into protons, neutrons, electrons, gravitons, magnetrons, and photons to name a few. Wavicles, on the other hand, evolved into protavs, neutravs, electravs, gravitavs, magnetravs, and photavs. All these particles contained the dualpairs of force energy and mass wave. Wavicles were the alterpairs of Monicles. Particles were structured in a reciprocating tri-dimensional system inscripted into the principle of 1ROOT or One Rule One Object Theory.

When monicles and wavicles coexisted and worked together as partners, various atomic particles evolved. These cosmic particles grouped, regrouped, and transformed into the matter with bymatter. Matter became a system and by-matter became the alter system. Visible materials belong to the Family of Matter, while invisible parameters belong to the Family of By-matter. Force, energy, mass, impulse, heat, pressure, signals, and waves are some examples of By-matter. They always co-exist when matter is present. Chemical elements are examples of Matter. 

A particle has its own identical frequency much like the distinct density of an object. This frequency triggers physicalities to be in control or be controlled. This means that Matter can dominate By-matter and By-matter can overshadow Matter. This principle in the Algorithm of Creation is known as the Law of Transcendent. We see light and not its particles because light dominates the material photons. We feel gravity and see no gravitons because gravity dominates the material gravitons. We see the physical world and see no by-material parameters because the physical matter dominates the by-material parameters. 

Meanwhile, in the nawlsclisian world, the non-particles are called Wylzan. They are Abstracts. They are non-materials. They do not have matter and by-matter. They purely evolved into information, instructions, and procedures. They create forms, dimensions, mathematics, sequence, patterns, rules, and laws. They arise along with inScription and Dimetrix.

The Animation Effect:

The Animation Effect is a theory that claims that since the beginning of time everything is alive due to a driving force which we called Energy. 

Objects are intact or bonded cohesively due to the forces pulling and pushing them. These combined centripetal and centrifugal forces are called gravitational attraction. When objects move, they create all forms of parameters like friction, heat, temperature, vacuum, pressure, weight, and density to name a few. Because of these latent motions and parameters, objects are always in an animated state. Even stationary objects are always in motion. Being stationary actually does not exist.

When objects transform from simple to more complex systems, they become highly more animated. The illusion of aliveness is manifested by an extremely complex, cross multi-layered synchronization of sensors-senses that structurally act and react in chorus generating the impression of being alive or with life. Objects that are highly animated are classified as living things and those that are not as non-living things.  

Objects are neither created nor destroyed. They do not live or die. They simply become animated over time because of the power of energy. Internally, they are dynamically alive. This embedded phenomenon of acting alive or with life is called The Animation Effect.

The Inscription Theory:

Inscriptionism or Inscriptionalism is the view that everything, including existence and consciousness, can be explained by the interim process of vitalic materials and embedded instructions through Inscription by Design and the Single Theory of Everything. Joey Lawsin, who coined the term, claims that everything is bound by the Laws of Inscriptions & Interim Emergence where the actions and behaviors of every object are influenced by its intuitive materials and embedded inscriptions.

The GOD Theory:

From the particle evolution or chemical evolution, another level of evolution came into the picture which I named The GOD Theory or the *Grand Organisms Dispersion Theory or the plentitude principle (Lawsin 1988). The theory proposes that species came from multiple ancestors rather than one common descent. It suggests that when atomic particles transformed into elements and simple molecules, they polymerized into macromolecules and developed eventually into cells. These cells were dispersed afloat over the oceans worldwide. Through the process of mutations, either in form of radiations or reproductions, these cells eventually conquered the lands. Through the process of creation and evolution, they gradually evolved into various families of species. 

Gnesis Hypothesis:

Another hypothetical supposition I am working on is the G-nesis or the creation by gravity. Scientists believe that animals and plants evolve on earth because the earth revolves just at the right distance from the sun. If it does not, the earth will be hotter like venus or cooler than mars. However, scientists have forgotten that creation and evolution exist due to the right amount of gravity. Think about it this way. Since Jupiter has a greater amount of pull of gravity it is hard for an object to walk or even move at all on its surface. Likewise, since Neptune has the least gravitational pull, obviously an object has no way to stay afoot. Both scenarios prevent any living objects to procreate and propagate. (my two cents, lol)

Space Brother Hypothesis:

This is another theory that suggests life on earth originated from extraterrestrial aliens or space human beings. These space brothers once visited planet earth and abandoned humans for experimental purposes or for being a weak species.

Of course, according to IM, aliens or space beings that look-like humans are impossible to be found outside the solar system and beyond unless the environment of that planet is exactly similar to earth. The environment plays an important role in the creation of why humans look like humans.

Here are the 20 Most Common Theories on the Origin of Life:

1. Essentialism - various species evolved the way they are - unalterable.
2. Lucretius Theory - life is developed by naturalistic mechanisms.
3.  Haeckel Theory - a progressive process that leads to the evolution of man.
4.  Lamarck Theory - the transmutation of species
5. Darwinism - man, and ape descended from a common ancestor
6. Abiogenesis - life emerges from non-living objects
7. Viegenesis - life is self-created by the dualpairing of instruction and material
8. GOD Theory - grand organism dispersion theory or the plenitude principle.
9. Orthogenesis - life has the tendency to evolve.
10. Saltationism - species evolved in a sudden large mutation/transformation
11. Mendelian genetics- theory on the laws of segregation and assortment
12. Mugaddimahism - Islamic theory that asserts humans developed from the "world of the monkeys"
13. Genesis - a supernatural being created everything
14. Pangenesis - hypothetical theory of heredity
15. The Animation Effect - matter is alive (animated) since the beginning of time.
16. Gaia Hypothesis - living and living things are but one gigantic organism.
17. Panspermia - life on earth may have come from outer space
18. Biogenesis - life comes only from life and not from nonliving things
19. Space Brother Hypothesis -life is a descendant of extraterrestrial aliens or space human beings.
20. Molecular Phylogenetics- gene-centered theory on the molecular sequence.


The Big Bang Theory corrected:

Scientists believe that the Big Bang happened in an empty space called a vacuum. If this is true then all its debris will speed radially away from the center all at the same rate continuously forever in frictionless space. If it started from nothing and became something, then where would all the materials come from? If they say that an atom is a 99% percent empty space and 1% material, then the universe actually started from the duality of something and nothing. How many is 1% of this material during the big bang?

Although the big bang is a misnomer, the universe actually did not explode and there was no big bang sound. The universe simply expanded and cooled over time. At this point, simple atoms first come to exist. They collide with each other forming new heavier elements. All the physical and chemical laws begin to work with each other forming suns and planets. Over time, the cosmos was created.

Second, stars and all the solid objects in space will not piece together when everything is moving at the same rate in frictionless space. Since all the debris is expanding, creating huge gaps between each other depending on the size of its chunks, the formation of these stars and galaxies is impossible.

Third, the National Aeronautics Space Administration (NASA) suggested some common misconceptions that need to be avoided about the Big Bang: The big bang is not an explosion but an expansion of the universe. The following excerpts were taken with general permission under NASA publication guidelines:

* The Big Bang did not occur at a single point in space as an "explosion." It is better thought of as the simultaneous appearance of space everywhere in the universe. That region of space that is within our present horizon is indeed no bigger than a point in the past. Nevertheless, if all of the space both inside and outside our horizon is infinite now, it is born infinite. If it is closed and finite, then it is born with zero volume. In neither case, there is a "center of expansion" - a point from which the universe is expanding away. Using a balloon analogy, the radius of the ball grows as the universe expands, but all the points on the surface of the ball (the universe) identically recede from each other.

* By definition, the universe encompasses all of space and time, so it is beyond the realm of the Big Bang model to postulate what the universe is expanding into. In either an open or close universe, the only "edge" to space-time occurs at the Big Bang (and perhaps its counterpart the Big Crunch) and so it is not logically necessary to consider the question.

* It is beyond the realm of the Big Bang Model to say what gave rise to the Big Bang. There are several speculative theories about this topic, but none of them make realistically testable predictions as of yet.

And by the way, do you know how the "Big Bang" was conceptualized?

Fourth, is the Flatness problem. This problem has to do with the geometry of the universe. If the big bang originated from a point in space, the geometry of the universe should be circular or spherical and not elliptical as detected by CMBR (cosmic microwave background radiation). The expansion rate on all sides must be equally spaced since its material density and volumetric expansion are proportional.

Fifth is the Horizon problem. No matter which direction you look in the universe, the temperature is exactly the same in all directions. So, how could heat be transferred from one point to another if space is a vacuum? Radiation? Particles or waves? Since there are no particles in a vacuum, then it is through waves that heat can move from one place to another. But what is heat? Scientifically, heat is a form of energy created by the motions of atoms or molecules. So heat is a by-product of something with a mass - a material object. If radiation is made up of photons like visible light, then photons should have mass. But scientists don't believe that photons have masses. So the next option, let us look at the waves -- electrical charge or magnetic force? A plasma wave? How then heat and energy can be transported through plasma? Through the whistler wave or the supersonic bow shock? But these two theories still need particles. Whatever the case may be, even with all these scientific contrasts, heat and temperature can only be produced when something material (with a mass) is present. The formula of temperature and heat speaks for something that has mass.

Although the very very hot big bang is only a theory, it is still the most complete and scientifically sound model of the early universe until the string, black holes, and branes theory came into the picture.

PANGENESIS:

This is an article provided by an online friend about Darwin’s explanation of how one species changes into another: It is a variation of *Lamarck’s theory of inheritance of acquired characteristics (*Nicholas Hutton III, Evidence of Evolution, 1962, p. 138). This is called pangenesis - a hypothetical theory of heredity. Darwin said that an organ affected by the environment would respond by giving off particles that he called gemmules. These particles supposedly helped determine hereditary characteristics. The environment would affect an organ; gemmules would drop out of the organ; and the gemmules would travel to the reproductive organs, where they would affect the cells (*W. Stansfield, Science of Evolution, 1977, p. 38). Scientists today are ashamed of Darwin’s ideas.

In the first edition of his book, Darwin regarded "natural selection" and "survival of the fittest" as different concepts. By the sixth edition of his Origin of the Species, he thought they meant the same thing, but that "survival of the fittest" was the more accurate. In a still later book (Descent of Man, 1871), Darwin ultimately abandoned "natural selection" as a hopeless mechanism and returned to Lamarckism. Even Darwin recognized the theory was falling to pieces. The supporting evidence just was not there.

The theories of evolution and the Big Bang are the two mainstream theories accepted in the scientific communities. However, as we know that there are lots of other theories about the origin of life. But because of some guidelines, for a theory to become a universal principle or law, it has to pass four stages - possibility, probability, falsification, and proven, these ideas were not given serious attention due to the facts that to be a possible theory, one must be reconcilable with existing facts. To be a probable theory, one must be reconcilable more with facts, evidence, and laws. And, to be a proven theory, one must always provide an exceptional outcome of the law, and can be falsified.

*The discovery of wylzan in 1988 ranks as an important milestone in the history of Creationism. This informatics particle was discovered by chance during an experiment on Intelligence Konstant with two extreme breeds of dogs: a Malamute and a Chihuahua as experimental specimens. The experiment was designed to determine the single key factor that defines what makes life based on the principles behind Originemology, the study of the origin of origins.

*Abstract - is something that is not something - nothing. It is something without mass, the material stuff that makes a physical object. It is not tangible. It is not physical. It is immaterial - without a physical form - incorporeal - no physical existance (substance). It is sometimes the by-product of the physical world e.g. software, energy, colors, and notions all of which could exist but could not exist without the help of the external physical world (The Lawsinium Codexation Dilemma).

“If atoms are not alive and humans are made up of atoms, then humans are not alive.” 

~ Joey Lawsin

Excerpt from Evolution of Creation by Joey Lawsin. Published by Wasteland Books. All rights reserved.

*Inscriptionist  - sometimes called Lawsinist, is an individual with a passion in seeking or hunting the natural laws of the universe. Inscriptionists are inspired to uncover the beauty and elegance of formulas, equations, and natural laws in every nook and cranny of the universe to unearth the central dogma of life known as the Single Theory of Everything. Inscriptionism is its philosophical doctrine.

...