Pages

Showing posts with label The Universal Law. Show all posts
Showing posts with label The Universal Law. Show all posts

Monday, September 27, 2010

The Eight Natural Laws of Creation

by Joey Lawsin

The Eight Natural Laws are verifiable natural facts of life that need no scientific proof or philosophic validation. They are all solid, concrete, universally factual, and one hundred percent true.

These Universal Laws are the foundations that support the Evolution of Creation:

1. Infomergence - The Law of Information
2. Inlearning - The Law of  Environment
3. Viegenesis - The Law of Coexistence
4. Codexation - The Law of Translation
5.  Dualpairing - The Law of Balance
6. Pericorpus - The Law of Boundary
7. Zizo Effect - The Law of System
8. Creation - The Law of Evolution

I. The Intelligence Konstant

Many believe that newly born babies have information already in their minds. But originemology tells us otherwise. A baby's brain is just like a fresh computer hard drive. It is totally empty with information. It has to acquire information through a series of processes. It enters into different levels of coding before it becomes knowledge. When the child begins to hear sounds, touches his mittens, smells scents, tastes his first milk, and sees shapes, he becomes aware of the outside world - his surroundings. As he repeatedly interacts with his environment, his actions become mechanical and the experiences of recognitions through the senses begin to register in his brain as information.

Eventually, the sensation and the environment form a dual-alliance. When a particular sensation is associated with a physical form, it becomes information. The association of senses with objects is called Labeling or Tagging. Crying can be associated with “where's everyone", "I'm hungry”, or “My undies are full”. The child uses crying as a tag or label to get attention, for milk or for peeh or pooh. Whatever the case may be, the child learns to associate his needs through physical objects, whether it is his mom, a bottle of milk or no.1 or no.2

As the child grows up, his environment introduces him to Words. His mother might introduce the word "mama". He mimics the word and eventually becomes a label for his mother. His dad might introduce the word "papa" for  father. His sister the word "milk" for milk. These words are the first information that registers in the child’s mind. These pieces of information become knowledge by association. When knowledge grows, intelligence follows.

Intelligence is acquired in two ways:
(1) we learn things from our environment; or
(2) we learn things from discovery.

Just like in our example, the child learns the word mama from his mother who is part of his surroundings or environment. As he matures he acquires new information from his teachers, from books, from friends, from his senses, and lessons from animals. He also learns by discovering new ideas, inventing new designs, or experiencing things accidentally. In other words, information is acquired from the environment.

However, this form of acquiring intelligence takes place not only in humans but in all living and non-living things as well. Everything gains information from its environment. All-natural things, from the primordial era until now, follow the same way of obtaining knowledge. This is a universal natural lawThe Intelligence Konstant or sometimes called the think factor.

But like humans, do animals, plants, microbes, algae, and rocks think too?

(excerpt from the book Universal Law by Joey Lawsin).

II. The Lawsinium’s Cat:

Newly born animals also learn things from their environment only the hard way. My imaginary kitten Uno who is often involved in most of my thought experiments will be the center of attention in today's study. He will be thrown into a nearby sea. From this test, the concept of instinct or inborn will be investigated and compared to a new concept of learning -- inlearning.

When this cat jumps into the cold water, his first reaction will be to get out of the water as quickly as possible. The sudden rush of pain, which he is experiencing as he engulfs a large amount of water through his mouth and nose, becomes knowledge. Kittens do not have even the slightest idea about the meaning of life or in this matter even death. The idea of saving its dear life as people believe is totally false. The immediate pain of suffocation that pushes Uno to paddle out of water is accidental information – an inlearn and not an inborn experience.

Getting out of the water was a lifetime instruction that was inlearned and will never be forgotten by the kitten. Saving his own life was not engraved in his genes. It was not genetically inherited. It was spontaneously experienced. It became knowledge. And this information will be stored in his brain for the rest of his life. However, when this incident happens the second time around, his reaction of getting out of the water becomes second nature. It becomes instinct (not inborn) to the cat.

Again, this simple scenario is another example of the think constant. It is 100 percent applicable to all-natural things - living and non-living things. Natural things learn from their surroundings. Genes learn from their environment. Everything learns from its environment or surroundings. This is a universal natural law – The Law of Environs or sometimes called the environmental factor.

III.  The Law of Dualpairing:

Natural things not only learn things from their environment; they also interact with their surroundings. Humans cannot exist without their outside surroundings nor their inside surroundings. This is again 100% true. Everything has to dualpair to something. Every object interconnects to another object at some point. The other name for this law is the Law of Coexistence.

The colors of black and white coexist to produce more colors. Black represents the absence of colors and white represents the presence of colors. These two elemental colors belong to the natural family of light. Visible light, as it is technically called, is made up of the predominant colors ROYGBIV. This mnemonics, which is the sequence of colors in a rainbow, stands for red, orange, yellow, green, blue, and violet in that order.

From this ROYGBIV model, most ordinary colors can be produced by dualpairing. Red when mixed with yellow produces the color orange. The orange is the middle color of red and yellow in ROY. Orange when dualpaired with green produces the middle color yellow in OYG. Yellow and blue produces a green color in YGB. Green and violet yields blue in GBV. Two extremes of colors always produce a middle color.

In addition, the colors red, yellow, and blue are called primary colors, while orange, green, and violet are called secondary colors. The dualpairing of these primary and secondary colors can also produce billions of more complex families of pairing. Three colors mixed together are called tripairing. Four colors combined as one is called quadpairing. Six colors is hexapairing and so on. 

Also, the tripairing of the primary and secondary colors can be simplified into the dualpairing of two basic colors. In other words, the tripairing of red, yellow, and blue can be transformed into the dualpairing of orange and blue. Why orange? Remember that the mixture of red and yellow produces orange. Furthermore, the quadpairing of red, yellow, green, and violet can be transformed into the dualpairing of red-yellow and green-violet or simply the dualpairing of orange and blue.

These combinations of individuals and transforming them into dualpairing created a family of systems called Multipairity. The inter-relationship and connectivity of everything can be reduced into two simple individuals called dualpair. Dualpairing is the primary factor in the evolution of creation. It is the first law of creation.

IV.  The Law of Codexation:

The transformation of abstract ideas to physical realities. The translation of abstracts to physicals. The conversion of the image of an apple to the being of a real apple. When we crave an apple in our mind, this apple stays as an image. There is no way that this image becomes a real apple. There is no way that our hands can create or produce a physical apple. We need our surroundings, our environs, to have this apple physically in our hands. Images and physicalities are the dualpair that make objects exists.

As an individual person, I do not exist. All of me is in my mind (100 train experience). But when another individual sense me, then I exist. My brain tells me that I am nothing but an image; and in order to prove that I exist, I need a physical person outside of me. You could be that outside person. Your mind has an image of me, it becomes physically real because you can see and read my writings here. These writings will not exist unless someone or something wrote them.

However, there is more into codexation. Let us go back to the paradox of the white shadow. Let us see how really the inner brain works. To do this we compare how a baby and a puppy see things. Then how these objects are stored in the inner brain. Then how labeling or association is important to understand things. Then how the outer mind transforms physicalities to intelligence.

When a baby sees a drinking cup, its orientation behind his eyes could either be inverted or upright images. However, he doesn't know it. But physics tells us this is a fact. So the question now is: How will the baby know the orientations in the first place?

When a dog sees the same cup, its orientation behind his eyes could either be inverted or upright images. However, the dog doesn't know it too. But physics tells us this is a fact. So the question now is: How will the dog know the orientations in the first place?

Now, when the image is behind the eyes, does it store itself in the brain or it disappears after both stop looking at it? We know that it stores itself as inverted or upright because of the fact they can both imagine or "see" the toy whether the toy is physically present or not. Remember that association is not taking place here yet.

When a plastic cup is introduced to a puppy, it doesn't know whether it is placed inverted or not in front of him. But when you associate cup with food, he will learn that he needs to look for the cup to get food. This is the same thing with the baby. Now,

......to be continued...


V.  The Law of Pericorpus:

This law states that all things are enclosed with a boundary, a perimeter that creates the image of a real object.

This law is also a tool that I used to prove the existence of an OmniPresence, God, who can be proven by all these overwhelming pieces of evidence that we sense. He may not have created us or we have not even evolved from him, but for the mere fact that we exist, dolphins exist, plants exist and the universe exists, there are other things beyond humans' comprehension that I believe exist.
How is this so?

Human ears can only hear sounds ranging from 20 to 20,000 Hz. Below and above these ranges, our ears become useless. On the other hand, dolphins can hear sounds that we can't hear. This does not mean that because we can not hear them, the sound does not exist.

If dolphins can hear them, then we must believe that they really exist even if we don't hear them.

This is the same thing with our other senses. Our eyes can only perceive a certain range of frequency called visible light. But other animals can see beyond the color red (infrared) and the color violet (ultraviolet). This again shows that they have a different world totally different from our world. These worlds could be upside down, multi-worlds, or a world that we have never imagined the possibility of its existance. Because humans have two eyes, we see this kind of world as normal to humans. Spiders have eight eyes that he sees multi-worlds. Bees and dragonflies have more than we can even imagine what kind of worlds do they have. So all these creatures have worlds totally different from us, but because we do not see their worlds, this doe not mean that their worlds do not exist.

It is the same with this GOD if we live in a world we called the universe, there is a great chance that He lives in a different world too.

As to how I figure it out, evolution and creation are not by GOD. God may exist without creation or evolution. But because we humans exist, we always think that it is only through a GOD that things can be created. Whether creation or evolution comes and goes; God will still exist. Whether man reaches its last day in the universe God will still exist.

And this God could not be the biblical god of the bible. Because based on logic and reasons, this God is totally has a sense of balance. He does not need anything for He is perfect. If He wanted to be worshiped then it is simply telling us that He has a need. This again contradicts the notion that He is powerful and almighty.

VI. The Theory of Viegenesis:

The existance of a CREATOR is not necessary for creation to create. In viegenesis view, the universe self-created itself by a set of natural laws created over time by itself. In a nutshell, creation self-creates itself.

In the beginning, everything started from the dualpairing of something (physicals) and nothing (abstracts). The physical(mass) is inside the abstract (space) and space is inside the mass. (note space here does not mean the outerspace, even time and outerspace are not present here yet). I called this particle as wylzan. The size of this particle is like the size of the period at the end of this sentence.

Due to the Law of the environs, these two in one reacted and counteracted. This is like a cotton ball side by side with a blob of water. At a certain point in time, the water will react with the cotton and the cotton will react with the water. Or to reverse the scenario, if cotton is soaked with water, in a given period of time, the water will separate from the cotton, figuratively speaking.

At the very precise moment, the water “wiggled” towards the cotton and vice versa simultaneously, a HOLE was born. This empty space was the effect of the cause of wiggling that created motion.
And since motion was born, three more parameters followed next: Time-space, force-energy, and mass-wave. Remember this is the very primordial beginning of creation, where each one of them is confined only in a primeval universe called “the size of the period at the end of this sentence”.

To clearly understand this, let me use a simple analogy by using a ceiling to floor boxing speedball as the particle wavmon. This ball is made up of mass and space existing as one object.

This ball is totally dormant, motionless, suspended for a very long time. The only environment of its mass is its space and the only environment in its space is its mass. After eons of its existence, by the law of environs, the two in one reacted and counteracted.

With minimally restricted movement (a wiggle), motion was born. The ball learned motion and became an inborn attribute. Inborn here means existing from birth but not inherited. Maybe the best word if I may introduce a new word....is INLEARN (learning from external sources).

As the boxing ball wiggled for the first time, let us say to the right, a hole of empty space and additional space where the ball is now was stretched. Since this ball is confined only in a tight space, there is no other option for the ball to go anywhere but to go back by moving to the left where the hole of empty space is waiting to be occupied again. And the whole process takes place over and over again for a long period of time like a vibrating string creating force-energies (energy) and wave-masses(matter).

But if you take apart the matter that holds the energy, everything will be all the same; if you take apart the energy(signals) that energizes matter(switches), everything will all be the same. (The Software Dilemma)

And for this reason, I believe that the existence of the macros and micros worlds started from the dualpairing of something(physicals) and nothing(abstracts). I did not use the term duality in my work because of how it classifies two things of a kind as opposing rather than complimenting or balance. Dualpairing is actually two of something and two of nothing. One pair exists in the physical world, and its alterpairs belong to the abstract world.

VIII. The Creation Process:

Perhaps the best way to define creation is to understand the process of how human beings create or build artificial machines or tools. Let us examine one concrete example that might provide insights into the process of creating/constructing a material object.

A four-wheeled, wooden wagon is a good project to start with. Before this physical wagon is created, we begin to imagine a picture of this wagon in our minds. It might be rectangular in shape, its box is made of wood with two wheels attached on each long side, the entire machine is painted red and the pull cord is then tied in front of the crate. An abstract of a wagon is created in the mind. Once we have a sharp and clear image, the next step is to bring this idea of a wagon to reality - in a solid physical form.

We accomplish this transformation in three major steps:

First, we draw a blueprint of the wagon with detailed dimensions and specifications; then, we gather all the construction materials and tools needed; and finally, we assemble all the pieces to build this physical wagon. These main instructions - creating the ideas, drawing the plans, gathering the materials, and assembling the project - are needed to create this simple machine.

So based on this scenario, Creation must be made up of an idea (abstracts) and materials (physicals). The idea of having a physical wagon will not become a physical reality without the help of the physical world. There must be two of something in order to exist in the physical world. An image of a physical wagon will not just pop up or come into being in front of you without the compliment of the physicals. A craving of eating a delicious apple in your mind, will not take effect in the palm of your hand unless you get it from the grocery store. An image begets an image and physical begets physical. I called this the ZiZo effect. Abstracts and physicals must work together in order for them to exist.

Dualpairing is the first law of creation. There must be two of something in order to exist and evolve. When wavmon wiggled, the first instruction of creation was born.

Is creation a process of bringing into existence of that which is created, that which is produced or caused to exist?

Creation is a process of bringing into existence that which already exists. If the god of the bible is believed to exist without someone/something creating him, then it is also a big possibility that the particle wylzan existed without a creator. In the first place, it is obvious and 100% true that everything we physically sense every day exists because something has already existed before.

But the problem with the god in the bible, which is conceived to have no form or image or simply an abstract, is that S/He could not have the power to create the physical universe because of the Law of Codexation.
But the god in the bible(abstract) is so smart that S/He created Jesus the Christ(physical). Nice move GOD!
But here is another problem. Jesus the Christ has no power to create gigantic suns, moons, and the cosmos as a whole.

IX. The Family System

If we look around, everything always belongs to a family. This is a fact – 100% true. A good example is the family of colors called Rainbow. This family is made up of billions and trillions and quadrillions of colors. But each color has its own distinctions. No two colors are the same. And on its ends or extremes, there is a high and there is a low. At one end is the Red color and on the opposite end is the Violet color.

Just like the family of emotions, Love is on one end and Hate is on the opposite end. There may be billions and billions of different emotions, but just like the rainbow colors, they need each other to balance their family.

If an Omni Persona is the ultimate super-being, s/he/it could probably place love and hate in our hearts just to prove that he exists. A GOD with a sense of BALANCE probably?

If this Being has a sense of balance, then there are lots and lots of pieces of evidence that will prove that S/He/It exists. Nature has chaos and harmony. We have males and females. We have ups and downs. They are everywhere! Even you, yes yourself, can name at least 10, a 100, or even 1000!

The Universal laws also serve as factual proofs that disprove the existence of the biblical God and contradict divine laws as well.





"The Duality of One is the UNity of Two"  ~ Joey Lawsin


About the Author :

Joey Lawsin is the author behind the new school of thought "Originemology". He is a revisionist who wants to change the world by rewriting the textbooks with new concepts that debunk the old scientific, theological, and philosophical ideas of antiquity. He published a book in Physics, created a conscious machine known as Biotronics, and conceived the theory on "Viegenesis". The article is an excerpt from his book "Creation by Laws".

Books that I have read to satisfy my curiosity on religion:

A comparative View of Religions - J. H. Scholten
Atheism Refuted -Thomas Paine
Atheism in Pagan Antiquity - A.B. Drachmann
An Atheist Manifesto - Joseph Lewis
A study of the Messiah - J.E. Talmage
A System of Logic - J.S. Mill
An Outline of Occult Science - Rudolf Steiner
Bible Myths and Parallels in Religion - T.W. Doane
Babylonian Legends of Creation - E.A. Budge
Common Sense -Thomas Paine
Criticism on The Origin of Species - T.H. Huxley
Christian Mysticism - W.R. Inge
Cosmic Consciousness - A.J. Tyndall
Creation by Laws - J.L. Lawsin
Dream Psychology - Sigmund Freud
Determinism or Freewill - Chapman Cohen
Evolution of Theology: an anthropological study -T.H. Huxley
Evolution: Old and New - Samuel Butler
Evolution of Creation - J.L. Lawsin
Exposition of Darwinism - A.R. Wallace
Einstein Theory of Relativity - H.A. Lorentz
Elementary Theosophy - L.W. Rogers
Esoteric Christianity - A.W. Beasant
Feeding the Mind - Lewsi Carroll
Five of Maxwells's Papers - J.C. Maxwell
Forbidden books of the original New Testament - William Wake
Heretics - G.K. Chesterton
Heretics and Heresies - R.G. Ingersoll
History of the Catholic Church - James MacCaffrey
History of Ancient Civilization - Charles Seignobos
History's Conflict bet. Religion and Science - J.W. Draper
Intro to the History of Religions - C.H. Toy
Jewish Theology - Kaufmann Kohler
Judaism - Israel Abrahams
Logic, Inductive and Deductive - William Minto
Lamarck, The Founder of Evolution - A.S. Packard
Mystic Christianity - W.W. Atkinson
Mistakes of Moses - R.G. Ingersoll
Mysticism and Logic - Bertrand Russell
Myths and Legends of Rome - E.M. Berens
Mutation - Hugo de Vries
Nature Mysticism - J.E.Mercer
Natural Selection - Charles Darwin
On the Origin of Species - Charles Darwin
Originemology - J.L. Lawsin
Pagan and Christian Creeds - Edward Carpenter
Pagan and Christian Rome - R.A. Lanciani
Symbolic Logic - Lewis Carroll
Sidelights on Relativity - Albert Einstein
Philosophy of the Mind - G.W.F. Hegel
Story of Creation: comparison study - T.S. Ackland
The Antichrist - F.W. Nietzsche
The Holy Bible - R.G. Ingersoll
The Freethinker's text book - A.W. Besant
The Expositor's Bible - T.C. Edwards
The Limits of Atheism - G.J.Holyoake
The Ancient History - Charles Rollin
The Sayings of Confucius - Confucius
The Game of Logic - Lewis Carroll
The Gnostic Crucifixion - G.R.S. Mead
The Critique of Practical/Pure Reason - Immanuel Kant
The Origin of Jewish Prayers - Tzvee Zahavy
The Analysis of Mind - Bertrand Russell
The Problem of Philosophy - Bertrand Russell
The Brain - Alexander Blade
The Higher Powers of the Mind - R.W. Trine
The Human Aura - W.W. Atkinson
The Legends of the Jews - Louis Ginzberg
Thought Forms - C.W. Leadbeater
The Wonders in Psychology - J.H. Fabre

Translate Me ...



Search This Blog ...

In California,USA ...