First drafted 1988 published 2000 revised 2011
by Joey Lawsin
Codexation, which is one of the signature theories of Originemology, also deals with the following ingenious scientific questions: (i) Can man think of something without associating his thought with a physical object? If he thinks of an idea, is the idea real without a physical object associated to it? If he thinks of God, does it mean God doesn't exist if he can't associate it to any physical object? (ii) When does his abstract idea become physically real? Is the idea of the letter "Q" real when he writes it on a piece of paper? If so, how does this abstract figure become a physical reality without being naturally inherent? (iii) How does the letter Q scriptionally "jump" from an abstract idea to its physical form?
Zero and One are abstract concepts. They are not real. They don't exist. They are neither material nor physical objects. They only exist in the mind by assumption. Mathematically, both words are called numerals by definition. When Zero is represented with the symbol 0 and One with 1, technically, the words become numbers by association. Numbers are the assumed physical representations of abstract numerals. By symbolic representation, both digits now exist materially outside the mind - the physical world; the world outside of ourselves, the inherent world that exists a long time independently before the mind. This type of association or representation is part of the Label System.
If the abstract idea of Zero & One can be materially created by definition, association, assumption, and representation, does this mean that they are now real, really physically real? If we write 0 and 1 on a paper, does this mean they are now materially or physically real? Does this mean they exist physically now? Are the written numbers proof of their existence? If the idea of 0 and 1 becomes materially 0 and 1 by paper, how can we then validate the paper evidence to be true, valid, real, or even false? Are the numbers real objects now, living in existence, or still abstract, imaginary, or imagined?
A basic form of the Codexation Argument regarding existence:
1. Zero and One are abstract concepts that exist only in the mind by assumption (Abstract Concepts).
2. When Zero is represented as 0 and One as 1, they become physical representations (numbers) by association (Symbolic Representation).
3. The symbols 0 and 1, when written on paper, exist materially in the physical world (Material Existence).
4. The physical representation of 0 and 1 prompts whether they are now materially real or still abstract (Existence Debate).
5. The challenge, therefore, lies in validating whether the written numbers are proof of their existence as physical objects or if they remain abstract concepts (Validation Challenge).
A Reality Test, dubbed the SCQRE, was developed by Lawsin as a tool to validate the actual realization of ideas' abstractness to material physicalness. SCQRE, pronounced SCORE, is an acronym that stands for Sensory, Codexation, Quality, Reason, and Equipment. Sensory means the personal experiences detected by the senses: sight, smell, touch, taste, or hearing. Codexation is a root determinant that connects the inner mind and the outer world. Quality entails the descriptions, attributes, properties, or characteristics of the subject. The reason abstract reasons involve equipment abstract reasons The equipment involves mathematical accuracy and the right judgment through logic. The equipment provides measurements, detections, and evidence-based analysis. These five basic Indicators of Reality are collectively tested to establish the physical existence of abstractness and the abstract existence of physicalness.
To determine if the numbers 0 and 1 are physically real. let us use the SCQRE test:
By Reason: if a=0 and b=1, then a+b=1, a true statement
By Quality: zero is round while one is straight, true descriptions
By Senses: they can be seen but can't be tasted, touched, or smelled.
By Equipment: both have no mass, or density and are not affected by gravity.
By Codexation: both are mental constructs that can't be found outside the physical world.
From the results above, the numbers 0 and 1 are conclusively still abstract, imaginary, and imagined. They are not real because both numbers failed to meet ALL the essential criteria of SCORE. Their physical existence is not real because they can't be proven by detection, codexation, or sensation. They are simply representations that have no physical or material inherent identification in the outside world. They might be true inside the mind, but they are not real outside the mind. In principle, Any idea that comes from inside the mind can be true but cannot be real unless the idea outside the mind is physically associated with an object inherited from Mother Nature. This proposition is known as The Second Principle of Codexation.
According to Lawsin, Nature is the source of early information. Without Nature, the early minds of the very first humans would be empty of information. Ideas would not be thought of. Ideas would not be formed. Ideas would not exist in the minds of our stone-age ancestors. However, when our primitive parents started interacting with their environment; gradually they accumulated information, eventually learned to use them, and evidently discovered new ideas. This shows that Information originates from nature and flows from nature to the mind, from objects to ideas (emphasis: from objects to ideas), and from physicalness to abstractness. This concept is known as The One Way Principle Of Codexation The Idea only becomes Real, when and only when the idea originates first from the natural world - The First Law of Codexation.
The idea of fruit is real when the physical fruit existed first before the idea. The idea of an animal is real when the actual animal came first before the idea. The idea inside the mind is real when the idea is the result of an object found outside the mind. The idea of an apple could not be conceptualized without the presence of a physical apple first. The idea of hot and cold could not be perceived without experiencing the sensations first. The concept of music could not be hummed and played without hearing music first from the outside world. Objects must exist first before ideas can be conceptualized. Without Nature, the brain cannot form ideas. Ideas are conceptualized because objects are materially created first. This is known as The Third Principle of Codexation.
To determine if the numbers 0 and 1 are physically real. let us use the SCQRE test:
By Reason: if a=0 and b=1, then a+b=1, a true statement
By Quality: zero is round while one is straight, true descriptions
By Senses: they can be seen but can't be tasted, touched, or smelled.
By Equipment: both have no mass, or density and are not affected by gravity.
By Codexation: both are mental constructs that can't be found outside the physical world.
From the results above, the numbers 0 and 1 are conclusively still abstract, imaginary, and imagined. They are not real because both numbers failed to meet ALL the essential criteria of SCORE. Their physical existence is not real because they can't be proven by detection, codexation, or sensation. They are simply representations that have no physical or material inherent identification in the outside world. They might be true inside the mind, but they are not real outside the mind. In principle, Any idea that comes from inside the mind can be true but cannot be real unless the idea outside the mind is physically associated with an object inherited from Mother Nature. This proposition is known as The Second Principle of Codexation.
According to Lawsin, Nature is the source of early information. Without Nature, the early minds of the very first humans would be empty of information. Ideas would not be thought of. Ideas would not be formed. Ideas would not exist in the minds of our stone-age ancestors. However, when our primitive parents started interacting with their environment; gradually they accumulated information, eventually learned to use them, and evidently discovered new ideas. This shows that Information originates from nature and flows from nature to the mind, from objects to ideas (emphasis: from objects to ideas), and from physicalness to abstractness. This concept is known as The One Way Principle Of Codexation The Idea only becomes Real, when and only when the idea originates first from the natural world - The First Law of Codexation.
The idea of fruit is real when the physical fruit existed first before the idea. The idea of an animal is real when the actual animal came first before the idea. The idea inside the mind is real when the idea is the result of an object found outside the mind. The idea of an apple could not be conceptualized without the presence of a physical apple first. The idea of hot and cold could not be perceived without experiencing the sensations first. The concept of music could not be hummed and played without hearing music first from the outside world. Objects must exist first before ideas can be conceptualized. Without Nature, the brain cannot form ideas. Ideas are conceptualized because objects are materially created first. This is known as The Third Principle of Codexation.
The nature and reality of zero and one, and in general all mathematical entities, is a topic that has been debated by philosophers and mathematicians for centuries. However, there is no definitive or universally accepted answer of their existence.
Some of the common views and arguments that have been proposed by different thinkers which maybe you will find useful or enlightening are discussed below:
One view is called Platonism, which holds that mathematical entities, such as zero and one, are abstract objects that exist independently of the physical world and the human mind. They are eternal, unchanging, and perfect, and they can be discovered by reason and intuition. According to this view, zero and one are real, really real, even if they are not material or physical. Writing 0 and 1 on a paper does not create them, but only represents them. The paper evidence is not a proof of their existence, but only a symbol of their essence12
Another view is called Nominalism, which holds that mathematical entities, such as zero and one, are not objects at all, but only names or words that we use to communicate and manipulate ideas. They are dependent on the physical world and the human mind, and they have no existence or meaning outside of them. According to this view, zero and one are not real, really real, but only abstract, imaginary, or imagined. Writing 0 and 1 on a paper does not represent them, but only creates them. The paper evidence is not a symbol of their essence, but only a convention of our language34
A third view is called Structuralism, which holds that mathematical entities, such as zero and one, are not objects in themselves, but only positions or roles in a structure or system. They are defined by their relations and properties within the structure, and they have no identity or essence outside of it. According to this view, zero and one are real, but not really real, in the sense that they are not independent or intrinsic, but only relative or extrinsic. Writing 0 and 1 on a paper does not create or represent them, but only illustrates them. The paper evidence is not a proof or a symbol of their existence, but only a model or a diagram of their structure5
These are some of the main philosophical views on the nature and reality of mathematical entities. There are also other views, such as Logicism, Formalism, Intuitionism, Fictionalism, and Empiricism, that have different perspectives and implications. You can learn more about them from these web search results that I found:
Philosophy of Mathematics (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)
What is the nature of mathematical entities? | Philosophy Stack Exchange
The Nature of Mathematics - University of Oxford
If an object has to exist first before the idea is born, how come in physics, in particular the Mirror Equation model, the natural pixels (dots of information), which comprise physical objects, when projected through a pinhole, become non-physical subjects on the wall? Could it be the physical world outside of the mind is as well abstract just like the world inside the mind? If so, does this mean that objects and ideas are nothing but the same? Abstracts and Physicals are alike? Is Everything Nothing and Nothing is Everything? Is Life a Pixel after all? Is Reality an Illusion?
These mind-boggling concepts are in the book Originemology. The author loves to challenge the current old belief systems in science, philosophy, and religion intending to replace them with fresh new insights for the simple purpose of making the world a better place. Some fascinating points covered in the book are listed below:
The Lawsinium Paradigms:
1. The Simplified Theory of Consciousness
2. The Caveman in the Box Trilogy
3. The Guesswork Predicament
4. The Birthday Conundrum
5. The Software Illusion
6. The Illusion of Reality
7. The Frame of Reference Maxim
8. The Lawsinium Cat
9. The Creator Argument
10. The Scriptional Jump
The Lawsinium Paradigms are a series of studies that take you to understand better the real meaning of life, Nature's secrets of Reality, the Universe's algorithm, and the Mind's Parapraxis. They are mental exercises that will change your perspectives about who we are, why we are here, and what we should do as a species.
"Information flows from Nature to Mind, from physicals to abstracts,
and not the other way around."
~ Joey Lawsin
Creation by Laws:
A Journal of a Creative Mind;
(ISBN: 978-1-60047-217-6).
About the Author :
Joey Lawsin is the author behind the new school of thought "Inscription by Design". He is a revisionist who wants to change the world by rewriting the textbooks with new concepts that debunk the old scientific, theological, and philosophical ideas of antiquity. He published a book in Physics, created a conscious machine known as Autognorics, and formulated the Mother of all Theories "The Single Theory of Everything". The article above is an excerpt from his book "The Bible Proves God Does not Exist".
 |
#originemology, #codexation dilemma, #autognorics, #interim emergence, #inscription by design
# Codexation, #Codexation Dilemma, # Transcodification, #Originemology, #SCQRE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No comments:
Post a Comment