Posts
by Joey Lawsin
Originemology, or the "study of the origin of origins", is a pioneering discipline that's generally concerned with the roots of everything and everyone. This new school of thought deals with the creation and evolution of all things.
Specifically, its integral component is twofold: one, it deals with the source or birth of all notions, ideas, or concepts made-up by man like information, languages, ideas, behaviors, emotions, gods and tools; and second, it also deals with the root of origin of everything natural or created by nature like the universe, elements, plants and animals (Lawsin 2000).
In a broader sense, Originemology is a cross-disciplinary research of anthropology, archaeology, geography, and chronology. Its main objective is to systematically trace backward the primal source or birth of a notion -- the creation and evolution of an idea beginning from being a single elemental entity to an emerging complex structure. The study is guided by the following research questions:
1. Who gave birth to the idea?
2. When was the notion first conceptualized?
3. Where was the notion first conceptualized
4. How did the concept originate?
5. Why was the idea created in the first place?
A cultural hereditary cue, I coined *namo or name, is a single concept, a collection of idea, or the first original information particle that was being passed on from individual to individual to generation after generation. Namons are cues of information (Q-particles) which have been acquired, copied and passed on from from one atom to another atom, one memory cell to another memory cell, from one substance to another substance, from one specie to another specie or from one culture to another culture. Namons are the lawsinic instructional konstant (mnemonically named The Link) that connect entities.
The five cardinal collaborating principles that lay the foundations of Originemology constitute the following signature theories by the author: Codexation, Viegenesis, Dimetrix, The Inlearning Konstant, and the Law of Systemic Instruction and Vitalic Material or The Dualpair (Lawsin 2000).
The new study is also instrumental in shedding new light to the five major ancient questions: Who or what created the universe? How all creation are created? Where did we come from? and, Why are we here?
It also debunks the existence of God. The Law of Originemology states that everything has a beginning, the source of origin. It is a natural law - a universal law that is experienced by everything, everyone and maybe God (Originemology, 2000).
The Scientific Investigation:
Part 1. The case on the Origin of the Number System.
Part 2. The case study on the Acquisition of Information.
Part 3. The Codexation Dilemma.
Part 1. The Case on the Origin of the Number System:
When I was a kid, I was deeply fascinated with numbers that at a very early age I learned counting from 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 by heart. After completing the first 10 numbers, I started mastering the next 10 numbers ....10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20. Then the next group of ten numbers.....21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 .... and so forth and so on until I can recite each number from 1 to 100 with confidence.
However, visualizing and memorizing these groups of numbers were far from easy. Well one thing was for sure..... I was not good in memorization. Eventually ...... I realized that there was a simpler way to remember these numbers. I figured out that the first set of ten numbers .... 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 .... was used over and over again to generate new sets of numbers. These ten basic counting numbers were the fundamental pattern repeatedly used in order numbers will evolve and propagate.
Examination:
To examine how these numbers were created, the basic pattern will be organized in the table matrix as follows. In the first row, the ten original counting numbers – 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 will be listed horizontally. They will serve as the basis for generating new groups of number. Numbers generated from the rows will be set up vertically as guide or reference in the first column. On this grayed area, each number will be paired individually with the ten basic counting numbers.
Interpretation:
When the ten basic numbers ... 0123456789 ... are listed in the second row and the number 1 is placed in front of each number, a new set of numbers will be created namely .... 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19. Hence, after counting from 0 to 9, the numbers 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 will come next.
If the same set of ten numbers ... 0123456789 ... is listed again in the third row and the number 2 is placed in front of each number on the set, the next new group of numbers will be....20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29. And again, after counting from 0 to 19, the numbers 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29.... follows next.
If the same process is repeated in the fourth row, where the number 3 is placed in front of 0123456789, the next new group will be....30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39. So after counting from 0 to 29, the following numbers 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39 will come next.
Propagation:
If the same set of rules is implemented over and over repeatedly, new numbers and new groups will be created and generated again and again. This set of rules governs the process of creation and evolution in the numerical world. By setting a list of procedures, an entity can evolve, propagate and even branch out into new entities and new families. It could even branch out into new individual systems totally different from its original root [Lawsin, 2000]
Reproduction:
Applying the number generating method and using the same rules and patterns, let us try to generate a new number system totally different from the standard counting system. Instead of using 10 numbers, let us use 8 numbers, six numbers, three numbers or two numbers as the basis of the counting system. Can this be done?
The numerical system used in Mars is base-6. Martians are believed to have three fingers on each hand. Assuming this is true, then their basic set of counting numbers is made up of six digits and the number system can be called the Base-6 system. If the same fundamental rules of generating numbers in the base-10 system are followed, then the Martians matrix table would look like as follows:
Analyzing the table above, Martians counting system starts from 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. However, instead of 6, 7, 8, 9, the numbers 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 follow the number 5. Then after 15, the numbers 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 come next instead of 16, 17, 18 and so on. After 25, the numbers 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 follow next instead of 26, 27, 28 and so on. And if the same set of rules will go on and on, the martian number system will evolve and propagate just like the base-10 system forever.
The number system of Mars compared with that of Earth is obviously different. The number 6 on Earth is equivalent to the number 10 on Mars, human's number 7 is Martian's number 11, and our 8 is their 12. Whatever the number is, it is the set of rules that governs the creation and evolution of these two systems. And the least number that can be paired to produce a never-ending family of individuals is made up of two entities.
The binary system and the Maya number system are two interesting number systems that can yield a never-ending products by pairing two individuals. The former, which roots from two numbers 0 and 1, can generate the alphabets A,B,C,D,E,F, and produce new families of software and hardware. On the other hand, sticks, rocks, shells, leaves, and fingers were used for counting by our ancient ancestors. The Maya number system, which in essence a binary system with a twist, was made up of two symbols - a stone(dot) and a stick(dash). The dot was counted as one and the dash was counted as five. A shell which was equivalent to zero was also included. The counting system even branched out over time into new systems from smoke signals, the morse code into the world wide web.
The numerical system widely used today actually evolved from the Inca civilization, the Ancient Egyptian, the Mayan, the Greek, the Babylonian, the Sumerians and the Chinese. Whether their systems were made up of two, three, six or eight digits, all of them followed the same set of rules that instruct to produce new entities and new families. The creation of rules is the key factor that governs the evolution of every number system and every other systems known to nature and men. As you will see later on, inlearned instructions are the rules that animate everything and everyone.
As I reached my teenage years, my fascination with numbers has snowballed and skyrocketed. Equipped with my father’s geometry book, I learned to extrapolate postulates, theorems, mathematical principles and interlinked all these knowledge together to find out how a dot transforms into a line, into a triangle and other types of linear, circular and dimensional figures. My infatuation even led me to unfold the formula behind the Pythagorean Theorem by means of a new geometrical method and mathematical calculation. This also exposed me to explore how equations are derived, formulated and transformed. However, what caught my attention most was the fact that all the examples I had encountered in geometry were based from the geometrical figures nature has already designed. Nature provides all the information known to men. Stones, sticks and all the physical objects found in the environment are the materials that transform ideas or information to physical realities. Nature is the Mother of Information. A fact 100% true.
Part 2. The Case on the Acquisition of Information:
Objective:
How is information generated and acquired by men and animals?
Specimen:
1. A giant malamute (control)
2. A mini chihuahua (experimental)
Strategy:
1. A newly born husky is restrained from acquiring information from his environment.
2. The research environment is controlled and restricted from people, animals and objects.
3. Emergence of information is strictly learned by association.
4. Experimental subject is introduced to a new breed after a couple of years.
5. Transfer of information to the experimental subject.
Data:
1. Voice recognition through waveform signature generated by an oscilloscope.
2. Transfer of information from control subject to the experimental.
3. Response of the experimental subject in an isolated environment.
Conclusion:
1. Information is acquired only in two and only two ways: by choice and by chance.
2. Information comes from Nature.
3. Codexation Dilemma
Part 3. The Codexation Dilemma:
- Please see partial paper here
( ........not yet edited and to be continued .....)
* Surprisingly, I found out from another independent researcher that the word namo, although with a different background of origin, is synonymous to his word meme. The first time I heard the word meme was from a barrister whom I met at a Mufon forum. Interestingly, when I checked the etymology of the word, I found out that the person who coined meme was Richard Dawkins. Another parallel coincidence, Dawkins which rhymes with Darwin, Hawking and Lawsin is also a fellow atheist.
Specifically, its integral component is twofold: one, it deals with the source or birth of all notions, ideas, or concepts made-up by man like information, languages, ideas, behaviors, emotions, gods and tools; and second, it also deals with the root of origin of everything natural or created by nature like the universe, elements, plants and animals (Lawsin 2000).
In a broader sense, Originemology is a cross-disciplinary research of anthropology, archaeology, geography, and chronology. Its main objective is to systematically trace backward the primal source or birth of a notion -- the creation and evolution of an idea beginning from being a single elemental entity to an emerging complex structure. The study is guided by the following research questions:
1. Who gave birth to the idea?
2. When was the notion first conceptualized?
3. Where was the notion first conceptualized
4. How did the concept originate?
5. Why was the idea created in the first place?
A cultural hereditary cue, I coined *namo or name, is a single concept, a collection of idea, or the first original information particle that was being passed on from individual to individual to generation after generation. Namons are cues of information (Q-particles) which have been acquired, copied and passed on from from one atom to another atom, one memory cell to another memory cell, from one substance to another substance, from one specie to another specie or from one culture to another culture. Namons are the lawsinic instructional konstant (mnemonically named The Link) that connect entities.
The five cardinal collaborating principles that lay the foundations of Originemology constitute the following signature theories by the author: Codexation, Viegenesis, Dimetrix, The Inlearning Konstant, and the Law of Systemic Instruction and Vitalic Material or The Dualpair (Lawsin 2000).
The new study is also instrumental in shedding new light to the five major ancient questions: Who or what created the universe? How all creation are created? Where did we come from? and, Why are we here?
It also debunks the existence of God. The Law of Originemology states that everything has a beginning, the source of origin. It is a natural law - a universal law that is experienced by everything, everyone and maybe God (Originemology, 2000).
The Scientific Investigation:
Part 1. The case on the Origin of the Number System.
Part 2. The case study on the Acquisition of Information.
Part 3. The Codexation Dilemma.
Part 1. The Case on the Origin of the Number System:
When I was a kid, I was deeply fascinated with numbers that at a very early age I learned counting from 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 by heart. After completing the first 10 numbers, I started mastering the next 10 numbers ....10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20. Then the next group of ten numbers.....21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 .... and so forth and so on until I can recite each number from 1 to 100 with confidence.
However, visualizing and memorizing these groups of numbers were far from easy. Well one thing was for sure..... I was not good in memorization. Eventually ...... I realized that there was a simpler way to remember these numbers. I figured out that the first set of ten numbers .... 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 .... was used over and over again to generate new sets of numbers. These ten basic counting numbers were the fundamental pattern repeatedly used in order numbers will evolve and propagate.
Examination:
To examine how these numbers were created, the basic pattern will be organized in the table matrix as follows. In the first row, the ten original counting numbers – 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 will be listed horizontally. They will serve as the basis for generating new groups of number. Numbers generated from the rows will be set up vertically as guide or reference in the first column. On this grayed area, each number will be paired individually with the ten basic counting numbers.
Interpretation:
When the ten basic numbers ... 0123456789 ... are listed in the second row and the number 1 is placed in front of each number, a new set of numbers will be created namely .... 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19. Hence, after counting from 0 to 9, the numbers 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 will come next.
If the same set of ten numbers ... 0123456789 ... is listed again in the third row and the number 2 is placed in front of each number on the set, the next new group of numbers will be....20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29. And again, after counting from 0 to 19, the numbers 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29.... follows next.
If the same process is repeated in the fourth row, where the number 3 is placed in front of 0123456789, the next new group will be....30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39. So after counting from 0 to 29, the following numbers 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39 will come next.
Propagation:
If the same set of rules is implemented over and over repeatedly, new numbers and new groups will be created and generated again and again. This set of rules governs the process of creation and evolution in the numerical world. By setting a list of procedures, an entity can evolve, propagate and even branch out into new entities and new families. It could even branch out into new individual systems totally different from its original root [Lawsin, 2000]
Reproduction:
Applying the number generating method and using the same rules and patterns, let us try to generate a new number system totally different from the standard counting system. Instead of using 10 numbers, let us use 8 numbers, six numbers, three numbers or two numbers as the basis of the counting system. Can this be done?
The numerical system used in Mars is base-6. Martians are believed to have three fingers on each hand. Assuming this is true, then their basic set of counting numbers is made up of six digits and the number system can be called the Base-6 system. If the same fundamental rules of generating numbers in the base-10 system are followed, then the Martians matrix table would look like as follows:
Analyzing the table above, Martians counting system starts from 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. However, instead of 6, 7, 8, 9, the numbers 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 follow the number 5. Then after 15, the numbers 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 come next instead of 16, 17, 18 and so on. After 25, the numbers 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 follow next instead of 26, 27, 28 and so on. And if the same set of rules will go on and on, the martian number system will evolve and propagate just like the base-10 system forever.
The number system of Mars compared with that of Earth is obviously different. The number 6 on Earth is equivalent to the number 10 on Mars, human's number 7 is Martian's number 11, and our 8 is their 12. Whatever the number is, it is the set of rules that governs the creation and evolution of these two systems. And the least number that can be paired to produce a never-ending family of individuals is made up of two entities.
The binary system and the Maya number system are two interesting number systems that can yield a never-ending products by pairing two individuals. The former, which roots from two numbers 0 and 1, can generate the alphabets A,B,C,D,E,F, and produce new families of software and hardware. On the other hand, sticks, rocks, shells, leaves, and fingers were used for counting by our ancient ancestors. The Maya number system, which in essence a binary system with a twist, was made up of two symbols - a stone(dot) and a stick(dash). The dot was counted as one and the dash was counted as five. A shell which was equivalent to zero was also included. The counting system even branched out over time into new systems from smoke signals, the morse code into the world wide web.
The numerical system widely used today actually evolved from the Inca civilization, the Ancient Egyptian, the Mayan, the Greek, the Babylonian, the Sumerians and the Chinese. Whether their systems were made up of two, three, six or eight digits, all of them followed the same set of rules that instruct to produce new entities and new families. The creation of rules is the key factor that governs the evolution of every number system and every other systems known to nature and men. As you will see later on, inlearned instructions are the rules that animate everything and everyone.
 |
| Mayan Counting System |
Part 2. The Case on the Acquisition of Information:
Objective:
How is information generated and acquired by men and animals?
Specimen:
1. A giant malamute (control)
2. A mini chihuahua (experimental)
Strategy:
1. A newly born husky is restrained from acquiring information from his environment.
2. The research environment is controlled and restricted from people, animals and objects.
3. Emergence of information is strictly learned by association.
4. Experimental subject is introduced to a new breed after a couple of years.
5. Transfer of information to the experimental subject.
Data:
1. Voice recognition through waveform signature generated by an oscilloscope.
2. Transfer of information from control subject to the experimental.
3. Response of the experimental subject in an isolated environment.
Conclusion:
1. Information is acquired only in two and only two ways: by choice and by chance.
2. Information comes from Nature.
3. Codexation Dilemma
Part 3. The Codexation Dilemma:
- Please see partial paper here
( ........not yet edited and to be continued .....)
* Surprisingly, I found out from another independent researcher that the word namo, although with a different background of origin, is synonymous to his word meme. The first time I heard the word meme was from a barrister whom I met at a Mufon forum. Interestingly, when I checked the etymology of the word, I found out that the person who coined meme was Richard Dawkins. Another parallel coincidence, Dawkins which rhymes with Darwin, Hawking and Lawsin is also a fellow atheist.
Disclaimer: The author retains the copyright to most of the research materials on this site unless cited otherwise. However, some of the articles are edited on a day to day basis without notice. If you are interested to use any of these works for the purpose of scholarly study or debate, please first inform the author by email or cite the author's name or source as follows: A Journal of a Creative Mind, Joey Lawsin, 1988, USA.
No comments:
Post a Comment